Cited by 89Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Support received after bereavement by suicide and other sudden deaths: A cross-sectional UK study of 3432 young bereaved adults

Open access
Pitman, Alexandra L, Rantell, Khadija, Moran, Paul, Sireling, Lester, Marston, Louise, King, Michael, Osborn, David·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that people bereaved by suicide are less likely to receive formal or informal support than people bereaved by other causes of sudden death. Design: National cross-sectional study. Setting: Adults working or studying at any UK higher education institution (HEI) in 2010. Participants: A total of 3432 eligible respondents aged 18–40 years bereaved by the sudden death of a close friend or relative, sampled from approximately 659 572 bereaved and non-bereaved staff and students at 37 of 164 UK HEIs invited to participate. Exposures: Bereavement by suicide (n=614; 18%), by sudden unnatural causes (n=712; 21%) and by sudden natural causes (n=2106; 61%). Main outcome measures: Receipt of formal and informal support postbereavement; timing of valued support. Results: 21% (725/3432) of our sample of bereaved adults reported receiving no formal or informal bereavement support, with no evidence for group differences. People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received informal support than those bereaved by sudden natural causes (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) or unnatural causes (AOR=0.74; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) but did not differ from either comparison group on receipt of formal support. People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received immediate support (AOR=0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) and more likely to report delayed receipt of support (AOR=1.33; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.64) than people bereaved by sudden natural causes. Associations were not modified by gender, or age bereaved, but became non-significant when adjusting for stigma. Conclusions: People bereaved by suicide are less likely to receive informal support than people bereaved by other causes of sudden death and are more likely to perceive delays in accessing any support. This is concerning given their higher risk of suicide attempt and the recommendations within suicide prevention strategies regarding their need for support. Study registration: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychiatry/bereavementstudy/

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a UK cross-sectional survey of 3432 young bereaved adults, people bereaved by suicide were less likely to receive informal support and more likely to report delayed support than those bereaved by other sudden deaths, while 21% overall received no formal or informal support. The significant associations became non-significant after adjusting for perceived stigma.

Key findings

  • 21% (725/3432) reported receiving no formal or informal bereavement support, with no evidence for group differences; 78% (2572/3432) received some support, and 85% (2173/2572) perceived some aspect as valuable.
  • People bereaved by suicide were less likely to receive informal support than those bereaved by sudden natural causes (AOR=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) or sudden unnatural causes (AOR=0.74; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96), but did not differ on formal support.
  • People bereaved by suicide were less likely to receive immediate support within 1 week (AOR=0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) and more likely to report delayed support beyond 6 months (AOR=1.33; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.64) than those bereaved by sudden natural causes.
  • Among 210 respondents who had attempted suicide postbereavement, 67% (141/210) had not sought help for any postbereavement self-harm; the most common source among those who did seek help was a general practitioner (20%).

Methods

  • National cross-sectional online survey in 2010 of UK higher education institution staff and students aged 18–40 bereaved by sudden death of a close friend or relative; 37 of 164 invited HEIs participated, accessing an estimated sampling frame of 659,572 people, with 3432 eligible respondents. Exposures were suicide (n=614; 18%), sudden unnatural causes (n=712; 21%), and sudden natural causes (n=2106; 61%).
  • Outcomes included receipt of formal and informal support, no support, immediate support (<1 week), delayed support (>6 months), exclusive formal support, and help sought after postbereavement self-harm; perceived stigma was measured with the Grief Experience Questionnaire stigma subscale.
  • Analysis used multivariable random effects logistic regression with HEI as a random effect, adjusted for eight prespecified confounders, comparing suicide bereavement with sudden natural causes and with sudden unnatural causes; interaction tests assessed gender and age at bereavement, plus sensitivity analyses.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: selection bias from HEI sampling and pronounced male non-response bias limit generalisability beyond highly educated female groups; the limited age range restricts generalisability beyond young adults; no denominator meant no response rate could be presented; recall bias among those worst affected was possible; models did not account for pre-bereavement anxiety or other mental disorders; two secondary outcomes were underpowered due to group sizes <466; gender interaction tests had limited power, and gender-specific analyses were not possible due to low male numbers.
  • Evident from the text: the cross-sectional observational design limits causal inference, and receipt of support may reflect perceived availability rather than preference or objective lack of help offered.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014487

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The associations between suicide bereavement and support outcomes became non-significant when adjusting for perceived stigma.

    “Associations were not modified by gender, or age bereaved, but became non-significant when adjusting for stigma.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received informal support than people bereaved by sudden unnatural causes (AOR=0.74; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96).

    “People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received informal support than those bereaved by sudden natural causes (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) or unnatural causes (AOR=0.74; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) but did not differ from either comparison group on receipt of formal support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received informal support than people bereaved by sudden natural causes (AOR=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98).

    “People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received informal support than those bereaved by sudden natural causes (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) or unnatural causes (AOR=0.74; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) but did not differ from either comparison group on receipt of formal support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received immediate support (within 1 week) than people bereaved by sudden natural causes (AOR=0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90).

    “People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received immediate support (AOR=0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) and more likely to report delayed receipt of support (AOR=1.33; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.64) than people bereaved by sudden natural causes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    People bereaved by suicide were more likely to report delayed receipt of support (beyond 6 months) than people bereaved by sudden natural causes (AOR=1.33; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.64).

    “People bereaved by suicide were less likely to have received immediate support (AOR=0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90) and more likely to report delayed receipt of support (AOR=1.33; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.64) than people bereaved by sudden natural causes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 14
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the sample of 3432 young bereaved adults, 21% (725/3432) reported receiving no formal or informal bereavement support, with no evidence for group differences by bereavement exposure.

    “21% (725/3432) of our sample of bereaved adults reported receiving no formal or informal bereavement support, with no evidence for group differences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The sample was primarily female, white and related to the deceased by blood.

    “The sample was primarily female, white and related to the deceased by blood (table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of those receiving support, 51% received informal only, 14% formal only, and 35% both formal and informal.

    “Overall, 78% (2572/3432) of the sample reported receiving some form of support after the loss, whether informal (51%), formal (14%) or both (35%), and 85% (2173/2572) perceived some aspect of it to have been valuable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One quarter (24%; 824/3432) reported that they had been most affected in the first week after the loss, but a third (38%; 1274/3432) endorsed over 6 months after the loss, with no evidence for group differences.

    “One quarter (24%; 824/3432) reported that they had been most affected in the first week after the loss, but a third (38%; 1274/3432) endorsed over 6 months after the loss, with no evidence for group differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean time elapsed since bereavement was 4.9 years (SD=5.3; range=1 day-30 years), with no significant group differences.

    “The mean time elapsed since bereavement was 4.9 years (SD=5.3; range=1 day–30 years), with no significant group differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In sensitivity analyses simulating predicted non-response biases, the magnitude and direction of significant associations between suicide bereavement and outcomes were unchanged.

    “In sensitivity analyses simulating predicted non-response biases, the magnitude and direction of significant associations between suicide bereavement and outcomes were unchanged”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Bereavement by suicide is associated with an increased probability of suicide attempt in close contacts.

    “Empirical research now supports an association between bereavement by suicide and a range of negative health outcomes, including an increased probability of suicide1 and of suicide attempt in close contacts.2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    US and UK suicide prevention strategies recommend providing support for people bereaved by suicide.

    “US and UK suicide prevention strategies recommend providing support for people bereaved by suicide,3–6 but the extent of implementation is unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [3] US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention. National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action. Washington, DC: BMJ Publishing Group, 2012.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Department of Health. Preventing suicide in England: a cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives, 17680. 2012:1–57.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. Protect Life - A Shared Vision. The Northern Ireland suicide prevention strategy 2012-2014, 2012.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Welsh Government. Talk to me 2 - Suicide and self harm prevention strategy for Wales 2015-2020, 2015.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Bereavement by suicide is associated with an increased probability of suicide.

    “Empirical research now supports an association between bereavement by suicide and a range of negative health outcomes, including an increased probability of suicide1 and of suicide attempt in close contacts.2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Past suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and non-suicidal self-harm were described using standardised measures from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.

    “We described past suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and non-suicidal self-harm using standardised measures from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey,25 which distinguishes suicide attempt from non-suicidal self-harm on the basis of intent.26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] McManus S , Meltzer H , Brugha T , et al . Adult psychiatric morbidity in England, 2007. Results of a household survey. Leeds: BMJ Publishing Group, 2009:1–141.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The sampling frame accessed was an estimated 659 572 staff and students.

    “This accessed an estimated sampling frame of 659 572 staff and students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Formal and informal support classifications were derived from similar British and international studies of service use.

    “Formal and informal support classifications were derived from similar British23 and international studies of service use.29”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Depression was measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview screen for lifetime depression.

    “Depression was measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview screen for lifetime depression,27 qualified as above.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Missing data for model covariates and outcomes were less than 7% for covariates and less than 4% for outcomes.

    “Missing data for model covariates and outcomes were less than 7% for covariates and less than 4% for outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of 659 572 invited, 5085 responded, 91% consented, and 68% fulfilled eligibility criteria.

    “Of the 659 572 bereaved and non-bereaved people invited to take part, 5085 people responded to the questionnaire by clicking on the survey link. Of these, 91% (n=4630) consented to participate and 68% (n=3432) fulfilled eligibility criteria (figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    US surveys of support after suicide bereavement have tended to be small and localised or involve help-seeking samples.

    “US surveys have tended to be small and localised14–16 or involve help-seeking samples.17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [14] Farberow, 1992, The role of social supports in the bereavement process of surviving spouses of suicide and natural deaths, Suicide Life Threat Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] Séguin, 1995, Parental bereavement after suicide and accident: a comparative study, Suicide Life Threat Behav source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee in 2010 (ref: 1975/002).

    “The study was approved by the University College London (UCL) Research Ethics Committee in 2010 (ref: 1975/002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The thresholds for immediate and delayed support were agreed on the basis of clinical judgement and the published literature.

    “These thresholds were agreed on the basis of clinical judgement and the published literature.31”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Early childhood bereavements (before age 10) were excluded to minimise recall bias.

    “Early childhood bereavements (before age 10) were excluded to minimise recall bias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants provided online informed consent.

    “All participants provided online informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A priori sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of simulating predicted non-response biases, excluding 918 respondents from the 10 HEIs that had modified the protocol recruitment method.

    “Finally, we conducted a priori sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of simulating predicted non-response biases, excluding 918 respondents from the 10 HEIs that had modified the protocol recruitment method.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In 2010, 37 of 164 invited UK HEIs participated, with a higher response (40%) from Russell Group universities.

    “Over 20% (37/164) agreed, with a higher response (40%) from those classified as the more prestigious Russell Group universities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The denominator of bereaved people could not be ascertained using survey methods or routine data, so the proportion of bereaved people who responded could not be accurately measured.

    “As the denominator of bereaved people could not be ascertained using survey methods or routine data, there was no accurate way of measuring the proportion of bereaved people who responded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Perceived stigma was measured using the stigma subscale of the Grief Experience Questionnaire.

    “Perceived stigma, the subjective awareness of others’ stigmatising attitudes, was measured using the stigma subscale of the Grief Experience Questionnaire.28”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Multivariable models included eight prespecified confounding variables identified from existing literature and clinical judgement.

    “Our multivariable models included eight prespecified confounding variables identified from existing literature and clinical judgement: age, gender, socioeconomic status, preloss depression, preloss suicidal and non-suicidal self-harm, other family history of suicide (excluding index suicide bereavement), time since bereavement and kinship to the deceased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    HEI was used as a random effect to take account of clustering effects at the institutional level.

    “We used HEI as random effect to take account of clustering effects at the institutional level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Surveying the age range 18-40 minimised the potential for memory decay and narrowed period effects.

    “Surveying this age range also minimised the potential for memory decay and narrowed period effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Self-help was considered a separate category due to problematic formal/informal categorisation in relation to bereavement support.

    “Self-help was considered a separate category due to problematic formal/informal categorisation in relation to bereavement support.30”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    High levels of stigma relative to other bereaved groups may reduce both willingness to seek help and friends' or relatives' readiness to offer support.

    “High levels of stigma relative to other bereaved groups11 may reduce both willingness to seek help and friends’ or relatives’ readiness to offer support.9 12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Pitman, 2016, The stigma perceived by people bereaved by suicide and other sudden deaths: a cross-sectional UK study of 3432 bereaved adults, J Psychosom Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    It was possible that those worst affected had biased recall of support received and its value.

    “It was possible that those worst affected had biased recall of support received and its value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gender differences in help-seeking for mental illness exist, particularly in relation to informal support.

    “Given gender differences in help-seeking for mental illness,22 particularly in relation to informal support,23”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Surveys of the perceived needs of people bereaved by suicide indicate clear unmet needs for social networks to respond proactively and empathically and for professionals to offer immediate outreach.

    “surveys of the perceived needs of people bereaved by suicide indicate clear unmet needs for social networks to respond proactively and empathically and for professionals to offer immediate outreach.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Adverse outcomes and needs for support apply regardless of kinship.

    “recognising that adverse outcomes and needs for support apply regardless of kinship.2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study captured use of a wide range of formal and informal support sources and the time taken to access valued support.

    “We captured use of a wide range of formal and informal support sources and the time taken to access valued support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The multivariable models included pre-bereavement depression as a potential confounding variable.

    “Our multivariable models included pre-bereavement depression as a potential confounding variable”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The cross-sectional, observational nature of these data limits causal inference.

    “The cross-sectional, observational nature of these data limits causal inference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
36 of 36
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No British study has provided an overview of the range of support received by people bereaved by suicide.

    “No British study has provided an overview of the range of support received by people bereaved by suicide.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For service planning purposes, population-based studies describing the prevalence and correlates of support received by people bereaved by suicide are lacking.

    “For service planning purposes, we lack population-based studies describing the prevalence and correlates of support received by people bereaved by suicide.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The majority of non-responders were non-bereaved.

    “assume that the majority of non-responders were non-bereaved”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Receipt of support is a function of what is perceived to be available.

    “as receipt of support is a function of what is perceived to be available.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Suicide-group family-history percentage is understated

    Minor

    The 53 respondents are 8.63% of the 614-person suicide-bereavement group, which rounds to 9% rather than 7%.

    Reported 7 · recomputed 8.631922

  • Reported overall support percentage does not match its fraction

    Minor

    2572 of 3432 respondents is 74.94%, or 75% rounded, not 78%. Table 1 also reports 75% for this count.

    Reported 78 · recomputed 74.941725

  • Percentage most affected after six months is overstated

    Minor

    1274 of 3432 respondents is 37.12%, which rounds to 37%, not 38%.

    Reported 38 · recomputed 37.121212

  • Unadjusted no-support confidence interval conflicts with its p-value

    Minor

    The reported unadjusted 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio includes 1, whereas its p-value of 0.010 indicates evidence against an odds ratio of 1 at the 5% level.

  • School or college support counts do not add to their total

    Minor

    The exposure-group counts are 2, 0 and 0, but the total is reported as 1.

    Reported 1 · recomputed 2

  • Worst-stage counts do not add to the reported total

    Minor

    The three exposure-group counts for being most affected within a week add to 864, not the reported total of 824.

    Reported 824 · recomputed 864

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitman, A. L., Rantell, K., Moran, P., Sireling, L., Marston, L., King, M., & Osborn, D.
Affiliations
  • St Pancras Hospital (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Independent medico-legal practice, London, UK
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pitman, Alexandra L
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e014487
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617155687
Cited by
89
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
sudden death, informal support, formal support, bereavement support, stigma, young adults, suicide prevention, gender differences, age differences, British universities
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Bereavement, Cross-Sectional Studies, Death, Sudden, Female, Humans, London, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Class, Social Support, Suicide, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review