Cited by 55Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Postcards, green cards and telephone calls: Therapeutic contact with individuals following self-harm

Open access
Kapur, Navneet, Cooper, Jayne, Bennewith, Olive, Gunnell, David, Hawton, Keith·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Self-harm is a major public health problem and universal interventions such as contacting individuals by post or telephone following a self-harm episode have received much attention recently. They may also appeal to service providers because of their low cost. However, a widespread introduction of these interventions cannot be justified without a better understanding of whether they work, and if so how.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072496

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific follow-up strategies shown effective in reducing repeat suicide attempts and/or suicide include caring letters, postcards, crisis cards, and short- or long-term phone or in-person contacts after hospital discharge.

    “Specific follow-up strategies that have been shown to be effective in reducing repeat suicide attempts and/or suicide include the sending of caring letters,81 or postcards,82 crisis cards,83 or short- or long-term phone or in-person contacts after hospital discharge.84,85”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapur, N., Cooper, J., Bennewith, O., Gunnell, D., & Hawton, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kapur, Navneet
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-07
Volume
197
Issue
1
Pages
5-7
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2105221682
Cited by
55
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1247)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007543/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
self-harm, postcards, telephone calls, green card, universal interventions, therapeutic contact, low-cost interventions, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Humans, Long-Term Care, Postal Service, Telephone, Self-Injurious Behavior, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review