Cited by 90Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesInjury Epidemiology and PreventionMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental disorders and risk of accidental death

Open access
Crump, Casey, Sundquist, Kristina, Winkleby, Marilyn A., Sundquist, Jan·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Little is known about accidental death risks among psychiatric patients. Aims: To examine this issue in the most comprehensive study to date. Method: National cohort study of all Swedish adults ( n = 6 908 922) in 2001–2008. Results: There were 22 419 (0.3%) accidental deaths in the total population, including 5933 (0.9%) accidental deaths v . 3731 (0.6%) suicides among psychiatric patients ( n = 649 051). Of persons who died from accidents, 26.0% had any psychiatric diagnosis v . 9.4% in the general population. Accidental death risk was four- to sevenfold among personality disorders, six- to sevenfold among dementia, and two- to fourfold among schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression or anxiety disorders, and was not fully explained by comorbid substance use. Strong associations were found irrespective of sociodemographic characteristics, and for different types of accidental death (especially poisoning or falls). Conclusions: All mental disorders were strong independent risk factors for accidental death, which was substantially more common than suicide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.123992

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Garrett JM. gr23: Graphical assessment of the Cox model proportional hazards assumption. Stata Technical Bulletin 1997; 35: 9-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crump, C., Sundquist, K., Winkleby, M. A., & Sundquist, J.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-10
Volume
203
Issue
4
Pages
297-302
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2126971509
Cited by
90
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA030005)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
accidental death, mental illness, psychiatric patients, suicide, personality disorders, dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, substance use comorbidity, poisoning, falls, risk factors
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Sweden, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review