NICE CG178 Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults: Treatment and Management – an evidence-based guideline?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline (CG)178 was published in 2014. NICE guidelines occupy an important international position. We argue that CG178 overemphasises the use of cognitive–behavioural therapy for schizophrenia and those ‘at risk’ of psychosis, with recommendations that do not always reflect the evidence base. The CG178 recommendations on medications are limited.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence supporting current guidelines for preventive interventions in clinical high risk for psychosis is relatively unclear.
“The evidence supporting these partially conflicting recommendations is relatively unclear 11 , despite several pairwise meta-analyses having been published to date 10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .”
From Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta‐analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Leucht, S., Cipriani, A., Spineli, L., Mavridis, D., Örey, D., Richter, F., Samara, M., Barbui, C., Engel, R. R., Geddes, J. R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60733-3 · Cited by 2,561 · see citing works
Tiihonen, J., Lönnqvist, J., Wahlbeck, K., Klaukka, T., Niskanen, L., Tanskanen, A., & Haukka, J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60742-x · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
Jauhar, S., McKenna, P. J., Radua, J., Fung, E., Salvador, R., & Laws, K. R. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116285 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
Stafford, M. R., Jackson, H., Mayo-Wilson, E., Morrison, A. P., & Kendall, T. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f185 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Barnes, T. R. E. (2011) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881110391123 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Morrison, A. P., French, P., Stewart, S. L. K., Birchwood, M., Fowler, D., Gumley, A. I., Jones, P. B., Bentall, R. P., Lewis, S. W., Murray, G. K., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2233 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Morrison, A. P., Turkington, D., Pyle, M., Spencer, H. M., Brabban, A., Dunn, G., Christodoulides, T., Dudley, R. E. J., Chapman, N., Callcott, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62246-1 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Crawford, M., Killaspy, H. T., Barnes, T. R. E., Barrett, B. M., Byford, S., Clayton, K., Dinsmore, J. G., Floyd, S., Hoadley, A., Johnson, T. L., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e846 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines
Taylor, D. M., Paton, C., & Paton, C. (2009) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9780203092835 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Attenuated psychosis syndrome in DSM-5
Tsuang, M. T., van Os, J., Tandon, R., Barch, D. M., Bustillo, J., Gäebel, W., Gur, R. E., Heckers, S., Malaspina, D., Owen, M. J., et al. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.004 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Can we identify and treat "schizophrenia light" to prevent true psychotic illness?
van Os, J., & Murray, R. M. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f304 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
How nasty has NICE been to people with dementia?
Thacker, S., & JOHNSON, J. M. (2007) · Psychiatric Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.32.1.32a · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta‐analysis
Davies, C., Cipriani, A., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Radua, J., Stahl, D., Provenzani, U., McGuire, P., & Fusar‐Poli, P. (2018) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20526 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Treatment of depression in schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Gregory, A., Mallikarjun, P., & Upthegrove, R. (2017) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.190520 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Hurtado, M. M., Villena-Jimena, A., Quemada, C., & Morales-Asencio, J. M. (2021) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.1940759 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, M., & Perera, U.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Mark
- ORCID
- Taylor, Mark
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 357-359
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2125613153
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- psychosis, schizophrenia, cognitive behavioral therapy, antipsychotic drugs, treatment guidelines, evidence base
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review