Cited by 116Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Telephone-supported computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy: REEACT-2 large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

Background: Computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (cCBT) for depression has the potential to be efficient therapy but engagement is poor in primary care trials. Aims: We tested the benefits of adding telephone support to cCBT. Method: We compared telephone-facilitated cCBT (MoodGYM) (n = 187) to minimally supported cCBT (MoodGYM) (n = 182) in a pragmatic randomised trial (trial registration: ISRCTN55310481). Outcomes were depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD)-7) and somatoform complaints (PHQ-15) at 4 and 12 months. Results: Use of cCBT increased by a factor of between 1.5 and 2 with telephone facilitation. At 4 months PHQ-9 scores were 1.9 points lower (95% CI 0.5–3.3) for telephone-supported cCBT. At 12 months, the results were no longer statistically significant (0.9 PHQ-9 points, 95% CI −0.5 to 2.3). There was improvement in anxiety scores and for somatic complaints. Conclusions: Telephone facilitation of cCBT improves engagement and expedites depression improvement. The effect was small to moderate and comparable with other low-intensity psychological interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.192435

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2009, Depression in Adults: The Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults (Update – NICE clinical guideline 90)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–116 of 116

Metadata

Authors
Gilbody, S., Brabyn, S., Lovell, K., Kessler, D., Devlin, T., Smith, L., Araya, R., Barkham, M., Bower, P., Cooper, C., Knowles, S., Littlewood, E., Richards, D. A., Tallon, D., White, D., Worthy, G., & collaborative, O. B. O. T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-05
Volume
210
Issue
5
Pages
362-367
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2591924907
Cited by
116
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 4
FWCI
16.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10037, NF-SI-0611-10203, 06/43/504, HTA/06/43/504)
  • University of Exeter
  • University of Bristol
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/43/504)
  • NIHR School for Primary Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, telephone support, depression, MoodGYM, treatment engagement, primary care, anxiety, somatic symptoms, low-intensity psychological interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Telephone, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review