Cited by 116Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Telephone-supported computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy: REEACT-2 large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Open access
Gilbody, Simon, Brabyn, Sally, Lovell, Karina, Kessler, David, Devlin, Thomas, Smith, Lucy, Araya, Ricardo, Barkham, Michael +9 more·2017·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Computerised cognitive–behavioural therapy (cCBT) for depression has the potential to be efficient therapy but engagement is poor in primary care trials. Aims: We tested the benefits of adding telephone support to cCBT. Method: We compared telephone-facilitated cCBT (MoodGYM) (n = 187) to minimally supported cCBT (MoodGYM) (n = 182) in a pragmatic randomised trial (trial registration: ISRCTN55310481). Outcomes were depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD)-7) and somatoform complaints (PHQ-15) at 4 and 12 months. Results: Use of cCBT increased by a factor of between 1.5 and 2 with telephone facilitation. At 4 months PHQ-9 scores were 1.9 points lower (95% CI 0.5–3.3) for telephone-supported cCBT. At 12 months, the results were no longer statistically significant (0.9 PHQ-9 points, 95% CI −0.5 to 2.3). There was improvement in anxiety scores and for somatic complaints. Conclusions: Telephone facilitation of cCBT improves engagement and expedites depression improvement. The effect was small to moderate and comparable with other low-intensity psychological interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.192435

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing digital therapeutic and telehealth interventions with didactic components have encountered challenges including relatively low adherence, unsustainability, and inflexibility.

    “The existing digital therapeutic and telehealth interventions with didactic components, which enable health care providers to communicate with patients via digital platforms (eg, email and video call), have encountered several challenges, including relatively low adherence, unsustainability, and inflexibility [3,4].”

    From Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots for Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Adherence and adverse events section reports low completion of computerised CBT: 10.4% with minimal support and 19.4% with telephone facilitation completed all five sessions. The paper does not establish that these interventions are unsustainable or inflexible; its Implications section instead says telephone-supported CBT could be offered at scale. Its findings also concern CBT for depression, not digital therapeutic and telehealth interventions generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the last 10 years, several large implementation studies of DMHIs have shown that the majority of patients offered these interventions do not engage at the recommended frequency or complete the full course of treatment.

    “In the last 10 years, several large implementation studies of DMHIs have shown that the majority of patients offered these interventions do not engage at the recommended frequency or complete the full course of treatment [4-6].”
  • Concerns related to sustained engagement with web-based psychiatric interventions have been reported in routine-care implementation studies.

    “Similarly, concerns related to sustained engagement with web-based psychiatric interventions have been reported in routine-care implementation studies [4-6,17].”
  • Other trials have had high dropout rates.

    “Although some trials have shown strong patient engagement in health care settings (59), others have had high dropout rates (60, 61).”
  • Patient engagement has been a challenge for some digital mental health treatments.

    “Patient engagement has been a challenge for some DMHTs. Although some trials have shown strong patient engagement in health care settings (59), others have had high dropout rates (60, 61).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbody, S., Brabyn, S., Lovell, K., Kessler, D., Devlin, T., Smith, L., Araya, R., Barkham, M., Bower, P., Cooper, C., Knowles, S., Littlewood, E., Richards, D. A., Tallon, D., White, D., Worthy, G., & collaborative, O. B. O. T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-05
Volume
210
Issue
5
Pages
362-367
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2591924907
Cited by
116
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 4
FWCI
16.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10037, NF-SI-0611-10203, 06/43/504, HTA/06/43/504)
  • University of Exeter
  • University of Bristol
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/43/504)
  • NIHR School for Primary Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, telephone support, depression, MoodGYM, treatment engagement, primary care, anxiety, somatic symptoms, low-intensity psychological interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Telephone, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review