Invited commentary on … Confusing procedures with process in cognitive bias modification research
Open accessAbstract
The notion that cognitive bias modification should be appraised exclusively on the basis of trials where its postulated mechanisms were successfully changed starkly contradicts the standards of evidence-based psychotherapy. In the laboratory or as a treatment, cognitive bias modification cannot continue to eschew the rigorous scrutiny applied to other interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conclusions about the co-occurrence of reductions in anxiety and AB measures during ABM training are complicated by methodological issues such as differing outcome measures, confounding variables, low-quality studies, and publication bias.
“However, this cooccurrence is not consistently found [7], and conclusions are complicated by methodological issues (e.g., differing outcome measures, confounding variables, low-quality studies, publication bias) [9,79].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research
Kazdin, A. E. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Quigley, L., Kleiboer, A., & Dobson, K. S. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371305800702 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety.
MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143052 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis
Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Self-citationPage, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Kirkham, J., Dwan, K., Kramer, S., Green, S., & Forbes, A. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000035.pub2 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population
Murphy, R., Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Smith, K., & Clark, D. M. (2007) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.007 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Heeren, A., Reese, H. E., McNally, R. J., & Philippot, P. (2012) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.005 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Inducing an interpretation bias changes self-imagery: A preliminary investigation
Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., & Clark, D. M. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.001 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Koster, E. H. W., & Bernstein, A. (2015) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.006 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Changing attentional bias: Can it effect self-reported anxiety?
Harris, L. M., & Menzies, R. G. (1998) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615809808248310 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive bias modification: A review of meta-analyses
Jones, E. B., & Sharpe, L. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.034 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.001 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Wiers, R. W., Boffo, M., & Field, M. (2018) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2018.79.333 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Cristea, Ioana A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 211
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 272-273
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2766819446
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- cognitive bias modification, evidence-based psychotherapy, research methodology, therapeutic mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Cognition, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
