Cited by 19Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Community treatment orders and reduced time in hospital: a nationwide study, 2007-2012

Open access
Taylor, Mark, Macpherson, Melanie, Macleod, Callum, Lyons, Donald·2016·BJPsych Bulletin

Abstract

Aims and method Community treatment orders (CTOs) were introduced in Scotland in 2005, but are controversial owing to a lack of supportive randomised evidence. The non-randomised studies provide mixed results on their efficacy and utility. We aimed to examine hospital bed day usage across Scotland both before and after CTOs were initiated in a national cohort of patients, spanning 5 years. Results In total, 1558 individuals who were subject to a CTO between 2007 and 2012, of whom 63% were male, were included. After CTO initiation the number of hospital bed days fell, on average, from 66 to 39 per annum per patient. Those with a longer psychiatric history appeared to benefit more from a CTO, in terms of reduced time in hospital. Clinical implications Our data offer cautious support for the use of CTOs in routine practice, in terms of reducing time spent in psychiatric hospital. This finding is balanced by the more rigorous randomised studies which do not find any benefit to CTOs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051045

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mirror-image studies use people as their own controls and consistently report reduced use of admission and other improved outcomes after placement on a community treatment order.

    “Mirror-image studies use people as their own controls and consistently report reduced use of admission and other improved outcomes after placement on a CTO.”

    From Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. (2017) · cites this paper as Taylor 2016

    The Abstract reports a before-and-after comparison in the same patients and a reduction in hospital bed days after CTO initiation. But it says non-randomised studies have mixed results, not that they consistently show improvement. The Discussion describes autonomy, employment and quality of life as potential benefits rather than measured improvements; this study measured hospital use, not those other outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, M., Macpherson, M., Macleod, C., & Lyons, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Mark
Venue
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2016-06
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
124-126
ISSN
  • 2056-4694 (ISSN-L)
  • 2056-4708
OpenAlex
W2276166214
Cited by
19
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
community treatment orders, psychiatric hospitalization, length of hospital stay, psychiatric inpatient care, community mental health services, Scotland, psychiatric history, deinstitutionalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review