Cited by 45Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

A Comparative Developmental Study of Impulsivity in Rats and Humans: The Role of Reward Sensitivity

VAIDYA, JATIN G., GRIPPO, ANGELA J., JOHNSON, ALAN KIM, WATSON, DAVID·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: The present study was conducted to test the hypothesis that differences in reward sensitivity between adolescents and adults account for differences in impulsivity. In a comparative study, we examined preferences for various concentrations of sucrose solutions as an operational measure of reward sensitivity in adolescent and adult rats and humans. Humans also completed self‐report measures of impulsivity and reward sensitivity. There was some indication that adolescents preferred sweeter solutions compared to adults. Also, adolescents scored substantially higher on impulsivity. However, adolescents and adults did not differ in self‐ratings of reward sensitivity and personality scores were not consistently related to sucrose preferences. The data highlight some of the benefits and issues that arise with developing comparative measures in humans and animals. Future comparative research using alternative behavioral paradigms is necessary to determine if and how changes in reward sensitivity influence developmental shifts in impulsivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1308.051

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent rats are more sensitive than adults to the rewarding properties of food, palatable tastants, social peers, and novelty, as measured by conditioned place preference.

    “Studies conducted in our laboratory and others likewise have found adolescent rats to be more sensitive than their adult counterparts to the rewarding properties of a variety of positively rewarding stimuli. These include food and palatable tastants (Vaidya et al, 2004; Wilmouth & Spear, 2009; Friemel et al, 2010), as well as the rewarding effects of social peers (Douglas et al, 2004) and novelty”
  • Adolescent rats show greater hedonic liking responses to rewarding stimuli than adults in several circumstances, as indexed by consumption of sucrose or palatable substances and by taste reactivity.

    “Using a variety of behavioral measures thought to reflect hedonic “liking”, adolescent rats as well have been found to exhibit greater “liking” responses to rewarding stimuli than adults under a number of circumstances, with adolescent rats exhibiting greater hedonic “liking” than their mature counterparts when indexed via such traditional measures as consumption of sucrose or other highly pal”
  • Adolescent rats are more sensitive than adults to the rewarding properties of a variety of positively rewarding stimuli, including food and palatable tastants, social peers, and novelty.

    “adolescent rats to be more sensitive than their adult counterparts to the rewarding properties of a variety of positively rewarding stimuli. These include food and palatable tastants (Vaidya et al, 2004; Wilmouth & Spear, 2009; Friemel et al, 2010), as well as the rewarding effects of social peers (Douglas et al, 2004) and novelty (Douglas et al, 2003)”
  • Adolescent rats exhibit greater hedonic liking responses to rewarding stimuli than adults under a number of circumstances, including consumption of sucrose or other highly palatable substances and taste reactivity to sucrose.

    “adolescent rats as well have been found to exhibit greater “liking” responses to rewarding stimuli than adults under a number of circumstances, with adolescent rats exhibiting greater hedonic “liking” than their mature counterparts when indexed via such traditional measures as consumption of sucrose or other highly palatable substances (e.g., Vaidya et al, 2004; Wilmouth & Spear, 2009; Friemel et”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VAIDYA, J. G., GRIPPO, A. J., JOHNSON, A. K., & WATSON, D.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
VAIDYA, JATIN G.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
1021
Issue
1
Pages
395-398
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2100006381
Cited by
45
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
impulsivity, reward sensitivity, developmental differences, adolescence, sucrose preference, rats, personality, self-report measures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Reward, Risk Factors, Species Specificity, Case-Control Studies, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dietary Sucrose, Adolescent Development, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review