Cited by 55Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Food‐Reinforced Operant Behavior in Dopamine Transporter Knockout Mice: Enhanced Resistance to Extinction

HIRONAKA, NAOYUKI, IKEDA, KAZUTAKA, SORA, ICHIRO, UHL, GEORGE R., NIKI, HIROAKI·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: Dopamine (DA) plays roles in circuits that are important for brain reward and in striatal brain regions that are important for certain types of habit learning. These processes in wildtype, heterozygous, and homozygous dopamine transporter knockout (DAT‐KO) mice, which were mildly food deprived and allowed to make nose‐poke responses for food reinforcement, were studied. The mice were given 20‐min sessions of daily (a) baseline exposure to the operant chambers, (b) acquisition of nose‐poke responses in which responses were reinforced under a fixed ratio (FR5) schedule, (c) a progressive ratio schedule in which the number of responses required to obtain food was gradually increased, and (d) extinction of responses in which nose pokes were not followed by food. Neither heterozygous nor homozygous DAT‐KO mice differed from their wildtype litter mates in the number of nose pokes displayed during baseline exposures to the chambers, the number of sessions required for acquisition, the number of responses under the FR5 schedule, or the number of responses under the progressive ratio schedule. Interestingly, however, in the five extinction sessions in which food was no longer delivered by nose poking, homozygous DAT‐KO mice exerted significantly more responses than mice of either of the other two genotypes. These lines of evidence suggest a greater resistance of DAT‐KO mice to the elimination of the response and support roles of dopaminergic systems in habit memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1316.018

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HIRONAKA, N., IKEDA, K., SORA, I., UHL, G. R., & NIKI, H.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Saitama Institute of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
HIRONAKA, NAOYUKI
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
1025
Issue
1
Pages
140-145
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2045319307
Cited by
55
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • RIKEN Brain Science Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dopamine transporter knockout mice, dopamine, operant behavior, food reinforcement, extinction resistance, habit learning, fixed-ratio schedules, progressive ratio schedule, striatum, heterozygous knockout mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Eating, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Membrane Glycoproteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Reinforcement Schedule, Mice, Knockout, Membrane Transport Proteins, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review