Cited by 9Cancer survivorship and careCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The Needs of Older Adult Cancer Survivors During COVID-19: Implications for Oncology Nursing

Open access
Kilgour, Heather M., Galica, Jacqueline, Oliffe, John L., Haase, Kristen R.·2021·Seminars in Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Objectives Older adults living with cancer have been described as more susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and in need of special attention during the COVID-19 pandemic. For cancer survivors, the first year post-treatment is a critical time because many individuals transition back to their primary care provider and adjust to physical and psychosocial changes that occurred during their cancer treatment. In this longitudinal qualitative study, we followed a cohort of older adult cancer survivors through the first three waves of the pandemic to describe their experiences as a means for providing recommendations for how oncology nurses can tailor support to this unique population.Data sources We conducted individual, semi-structured qualitative interviews with 24 older adults at three time points during the pandemic. Data were analyzed drawing from interpretive descriptive methodologies.Conclusion Older adult cancer survivors' needs shifted during the pandemic from feeling confident and self-assured during the early days of COVID-19 to growing uncertainty and unease about their health and well-being. The main survivorship concerns included a preference for in-person appointments (as opposed to virtual), barriers to caregiver attendance at appointments, and diminished access to health care services.Implications for nursing practice Oncology nurses play a critical role providing care to older adult cancer survivors and are most familiar with unique patient needs and the gaps in services they face. We provide recommendations for oncology nursing practice that consider the shifting needs of older adult cancer survivors during COVID-19 and beyond.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151229

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many expressed concerns with the transition to virtual appointments, noting that in-person appointments provided reassurance and comfort, that telehealth quality was suboptimal compared to in-person consultations, and that telehealth restricted engagement and led to missed questions and reduced empathy.

    “Across the included studies, many expressed concerns with the transition to virtual appointments with their health care team, noting that the previous model of in-person appointments provided reassurance and feelings of comfort [35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]32. Committee on Family Caregiving for Older Adults, Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In: Families Caring for an Aging America. Schulz R, Eden J, editors. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kilgour, H. M., Galica, J., Oliffe, J. L., & Haase, K. R.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Haase, Kristen R.
Venue
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
151229
ISSN
0749-2081 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205042558
Cited by
9
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UBC
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Queen's University (SARS CoV-2/COVID-19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, oncology nursing, survivorship care, caregiver barriers, health care access, nursing recommendations
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Humans, Neoplasms, Oncology Nursing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review