Cited by 22Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Socioeconomic Burden of Ovarian Cancer in 11 Countries

Open access
Hutchinson, Brian, Euripides, Mikis, Reid, Frances, Allman, Gavin, Morrell, Lily, Spencer, Garrison, Ilbawi, Andre, Meheus, Filip +2 more·2025·JCO Global Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer remains among the most aggressive tumors with the lowest survival probability. Projections are that ovarian cancer will claim more than 8 million lives between 2022 and 2050 without better prevention or control measures. METHODS: We built an Excel-based instrument that uses a prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach and a societal perspective to estimate the burden of ovarian cancer. The instrument leverages data from editions of the World Ovarian Cancer Coalition's Every Woman Study, contains a micro-costing framework to assess the resources and costs of providing care, and uses data from novel systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted to estimate the effect of ovarian cancer on patient labor productivity outcomes and the time caregivers devote to caring for people living with the disease. RESULTS: Across 11 countries, we estimated US dollars 70 billion in socioeconomic losses attributable to ovarian cancer. Health expenditures to cover treatment in the first 2 years after diagnosis were 7, 41, and 118 times total health spending per capita in high-, upper-middle-, and low- and lower-middle countries, respectively. Patients spent 3,663 years traveling to or receiving treatment. Women lost labor productivity equivalent to 2.5 million workdays due to ill-health from ovarian cancer, and 9,403 women living with ovarian cancer or survivors were estimated to be missing from the workforce. Caregivers spent 17,112 person-years providing practical support to patients—an average of 33 days per woman living with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to quantify the social and economic burden of ovarian cancer in 11 countries and highlights its significant cost and defines actions needed to improve ovarian cancer outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/go-24-00313

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Reid F, Adams T, Adel RS, et al: Every Woman Study LMIC edition, 2024. Unpublished data. https://worldovariancancercoalition.org/our-work/ewslmic/
  2. Global trends and predictions in ovarian cancer mortality-PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27597548/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutchinson, B., Euripides, M., Reid, F., Allman, G., Morrell, L., Spencer, G., Ilbawi, A., Meheus, F., Gaafar, H., & Casolino, R.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • World Ovarian Cancer Coalition, Toronto, Canada
  • Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, International Development Group, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
  • Cancer Control, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, Division of Universal Health Coverage (Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
JCO Global Oncology
Published
2025-02
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
e2400313-e2400313
ISSN
2687-8941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407762450
Cited by
21
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 6
FWCI
19.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JCO Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • World Health Organization
  • Novocure
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
ovarian cancer, socioeconomic burden, economic burden, health care costs, labor productivity loss, caregiver burden, micro-costing, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Health Expenditures, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Socioeconomic Factors, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review