Cited by 303Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerCancer survivorship and careNursing care and research

Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors

Yabroff, K. Robin, Kim, Youngmee·2009·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, little work has been done to estimate the time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. METHODS: Data from a national survey of caregivers of cancer patients in 2003 to 2006 were used to estimate the time associated with informal caregiving in the 2 years after patient diagnosis with bladder, breast, colorectal, kidney, lung, melanoma of the skin, ovarian, prostate, or uterine cancer, or non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). Caregivers reported the duration and daily intensity of caregiving as well as the types and frequency of support provided. The median wage rate in 2006 ($16.28) was used to value caregiver time, and other methods to value time were evaluated with sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: On average, caregivers provided care for 8.3 hours per day for 13.7 months. The number of months and daily hours spent caregiving were the highest for cancer survivors diagnosed with distant disease compared with survivors with regional or localized disease (P < .05). Approximately half of caregivers provided emotional, instrumental, tangible, or medical support, although the frequency varied dramatically. Informal caregiver time costs over the 2‐year period after diagnosis were the highest for caregivers of patients diagnosed with lung ($72,702; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], $56,814‐$88,590) and ovarian ($66,210; 95% CI, $40,750‐$91,670) cancers and NHL ($59,613; 95% CI, $43,423‐$75,803) and the lowest for caregivers of patients with breast cancer ($38,334; 95% CI, $31,442‐$45,226). CONCLUSIONS: Time spent by informal caregivers was substantial and was an important component of the burden of cancer care. Incorporation of the value of informal caregiver time will be important when evaluating the costs and benefits of cancer control interventions. Cancer 2009;115(18 suppl):4362–73. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.24588

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yabroff, K. R., & Kim, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Yabroff, K. Robin
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-04
Volume
115
Issue
S18
Pages
4362-4373
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1967635412
Cited by
303
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
34.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
informal care, cancer survivors, caregiver burden, value of time, emotional support, instrumental support, tangible support, medical support, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, disease stage
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Social Support, Time Factors, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Survivors, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review