Cited by 294Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in a Genomically Guided Cancer Clinical Trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH)

Open access
Flaherty, Keith T., Gray, Robert J., Chen, Alice P., Li, Shuli, McShane, Lisa M., Patton, David, Hamilton, Stanley R., Williams, P. Mickey +18 more·2020·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across cancer types. The National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was designed to evaluate targeted therapy antitumor activity in underexplored cancer types. Tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed centrally with next-generation sequencing (NGS) in a master screening protocol. Patients with a tumor molecular alteration addressed by a targeted treatment lacking established efficacy in that tumor type were assigned to 1 of 30 treatments in parallel, single-arm, phase II subprotocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor biopsy specimens from 5,954 patients with refractory malignancies at 1,117 accrual sites were analyzed centrally with NGS and selected immunohistochemistry in a master screening protocol. The treatment-assignment rate to treatment arms was assessed. Molecular alterations in seven tumors profiled in both NCI-MATCH trial and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of primary tumors were compared. RESULTS: Molecular profiling was successful in 93.0% of specimens. An actionable alteration was found in 37.6%. After applying clinical and molecular exclusion criteria, 17.8% were assigned (26.4% could have been assigned if all subprotocols were available simultaneously). Eleven subprotocols reached their accrual goal as of this report. Actionability rates differed among histologies (eg, > 35% for urothelial cancers and < 6% for pancreatic and small-cell lung cancer). Multiple actionable or resistance-conferring tumor mutations were seen in 11.9% and 71.3% of specimens, respectively. Known resistance mutations to targeted therapies were numerically more frequent in NCI-MATCH than TCGA tumors, but not markedly so. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated feasibility of screening large numbers of patients at numerous accruing sites in a complex trial to test investigational therapies for moderately frequent molecular targets. Co-occurring resistance mutations were common and endorse investigation of combination targeted-therapy regimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.19.03010

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a small proportion of patients, approximately 10-20%, have an actionable alteration that can be coupled to a specific intervention.

    “However, as shown in several clinical trials161–165, only a small proportion of patients (approx. 10–20%) have an actionable alteration that can be coupled to a specific intervention161.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [165]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flaherty, K. T., Gray, R. J., Chen, A. P., Li, S., McShane, L. M., Patton, D., Hamilton, S. R., Williams, P. M., Iafrate, A. J., Sklar, J., Mitchell, E. P., Harris, L. N., Takebe, N., Sims, D. J., Coffey, B., Fu, T., Routbort, M., Zwiebel, J. A., Rubinstein, L. V., Little, R. F., Arteaga, C. L., Comis, R., Abrams, J. S., O’Dwyer, P. J., Conley, B. A., & for the NCI-MATCH team
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (US)
  • Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD
Corresponding author
Flaherty, Keith T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2020-11-20
Volume
38
Issue
33
Pages
3883-3894
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3092241364
Cited by
294
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 3
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U10CA180820, UG1CA233337, UG1CA233329, UG1CA233180, UG1CA233341, U10CA180794, UG1CA233302, U24CA196172)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
NCI-MATCH trial, actionable molecular alterations, targeted therapy, molecular profiling, next-generation sequencing, resistance mutations, combination targeted therapy, refractory cancer, urothelial carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, small cell lung cancer
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Biopsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Young Adult, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review