Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Klempnauer, J, Ridder, G J, von Wasielewski, R, Werner, M, Weimann, A, Pichlmayr, R·1997·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define the prognostic factors after surgical resection of bile duct carcinomas at the hepatic bifurcation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective single-center experience details 151 patients after surgical resection of central bile duct carcinoma performed between 1971 and 1995. Tumor removal was accomplished by resection of the bile duct bifurcation either alone (group I, n = 33), in combination with hepatic resection (group II, n = 77), or combined with hepatic and vascular resection (group III, n = 41). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the relationship between each of the clinicopathologic variables and survival was assessed by the log-rank test. Multivariate results were confirmed using Cox regression. RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality rate was 9.9% and depended on the extent of resection (group 1, 6.1%; group II, 7.8%; group III, 17.1%). After exclusion of hospital deaths, the overall patient survival rate was 28.4% at 5 and 15.5% at 10 years, with a median survival duration of 2.05 +/- 0.23 years. Univariate survival analysis identified tumor size, lymph node metastases, residual tumor stage, and tumor grading as factors with a statistically significant prognostic impact. Survival prognosis was not influenced by the site of the tumor according to the classification of Bismuth and Corlette, extent of resection, International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage, perineural and vascular invasion, age, or sex. In a multivariate Cox analysis, only lymph node metastases and residual tumor stage proved to be of independent prognostic significance. CONCLUSION: Resection of central bile duct carcinoma is feasible in many patients and a favorable outcome after resection is mainly determined by curative resection and the absence of lymph node metastases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.947

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Klempnauer, J., Ridder, G. J., von Wasielewski, R., Werner, M., Weimann, A., & Pichlmayr, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1997-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
947-954
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2103845052
Cited by
286
References
14
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.947
The paper
Klempnauer, J., Ridder, G. J., von Wasielewski, R., Werner, M., Weimann, A., & Pichlmayr, R. (1997). Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.