Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunocytochemical markers in stage I lung cancer: relevance to prognosis.

Pastorino, U, Andreola, S, Tagliabue, E, Pezzella, F, Incarbone, M, Sozzi, G, Buyse, M, Menard, S, Pierotti, M, Rilke, F·1997·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the frequency of the expression and prognostic significance of a panel of immunocytochemical markers in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 515 cases of pathologic stage I NSCLC were analyzed. The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 102 months. The following immunocytochemical markers were tested: blood group A and precursors of blood antigens; laminin receptor; c-erbB1/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-erbB2/Neu; BCl2; p53; and angiogenesis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and time to recurrence were calculated for clinical variables and biologic markers using the Cox model for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The pathologic tumor extension (pT) represented the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = .0008) and time to recurrence (P = .0007). None of the immunocytochemical markers emerged as an independent predictive factor for survival. Bcl2-positive tumors showed a better time to recurrence (P = .03), but the difference lost statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. Of interest, in the group of 137 patients classified as pT1N0, both EGFR expression and nonangiogenic type of vascular pattern were associated with a poorer survival (P = .02). However, data derived from subset analysis must be interpreted cautiously. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support a relevant prognostic role of immunocytochemical markers in NSCLC. The evidence is not sufficient to alter clinical practice or even to restrict clinical trials of adjuvant treatments to predefined biologic subsets of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2858

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Pastorino, U., Andreola, S., Tagliabue, E., Pezzella, F., Incarbone, M., Sozzi, G., Buyse, M., Menard, S., Pierotti, M., & Rilke, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1997-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
2858-2865
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1960304662
Cited by
302
References
22
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunocytochemical markers in stage I lung cancer: relevance to prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2858
The paper
Pastorino, U., Andreola, S., Tagliabue, E., Pezzella, F., Incarbone, M., Sozzi, G., Buyse, M., Menard, S., Pierotti, M., & Rilke, F. (1997). Immunocytochemical markers in stage I lung cancer: relevance to prognosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2858

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.