The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In 1993, findings from a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial to evaluate the worth of radiation therapy after lumpectomy concluded that the combination was more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for localized intraductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS). This report extends those findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (N = 818) with localized DCIS were randomly assigned to lumpectomy or lumpectomy plus radiation (50 Gy). Tissue was removed so that resected specimen margins were histologically tumor-free. Mean follow-up time was 90 months (range, 67 to 130). Size and method of tumor detection were determined by central clinical, mammographic, and pathologic assessment. Life-table estimates of event-free survival and survival, average annual rates of occurrence for specific events, relative risks for event-specific end points, and cumulative probability of specific events comprising event-free survival are presented. RESULTS: The benefit of lumpectomy plus radiation was virtually unchanged between 5 and 8 years of follow-up and was due to a reduction in invasive and noninvasive ipsilateral breast tumors (IBTs). Incidence of locoregional and distant events remained similar in both treatment groups; deaths were only infrequently related to breast cancer. Incidence of noninvasive IBT was reduced from 13.4% to 8.2% (P = .007), and of invasive IBT, from 13.4% to 3.9% (P < .0001). All cohorts benefited from radiation regardless of clinical or mammographic tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: Through 8 years of follow-up, our findings continue to indicate that lumpectomy plus radiation is more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for women with localized, mammographically detected DCIS. When evaluated according to the mammographic characteristics of their DCIS, all groups benefited from radiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
Mantel, N. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 7,519
Fisher, B., Bauer, M., Margolese, R., Poisson, R., Pilch, Y., Redmond, C., Fisher, E., Wolmark, N., Deutsch, M., Montague, E., et al. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198503143121101 · Cited by 2,194
Self-citationThe Analysis of Failure Times in the Presence of Competing Risks
Prentice, R. L., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Peterson, A. V., Flournoy, N., Farewell, V. T., & Breslow, N. E. (1978) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530374 · Cited by 1,266
Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ
Poller, D. N., Barth, A., Slamon, D. J., Silverstein, M. J., Gierson, E. D., Coburn, W. J., Waisman, J. R., Gamagami, P., & Lewinsky, B. S. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90982-6 · Cited by 679
Fisher, E. R., Dignam, J., Tan-Chiu, E., Costantino, J., Fisher, B., Paik, S., Wolmark, N., & for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Bowel Project (NSABP) Collaborating Investigators (1999) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<429::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-y · Cited by 500
Self-citationGaynor, J. J., Feuer, E. J., Tan, C. C., Wu, D. H., Little, C. R., Straus, D. J., Clarkson, B. D., & Brennan, M. F. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476289 · Cited by 483
Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer.
Balch, C. M., Singletary, S. E., & Bland, K. I. (1993) · PubMed Central · Cited by 83
Fisher, B., Wolmark, N., Fisher, E. R., & Deutsch, M. (1985) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf01655182 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Cited by
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
Burstein, H. J., Polyak, K., Wong, J. S., Lester, S. C., & Kaelin, C. M. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra031301 · Cited by 759
Oncoplastic Techniques Allow Extensive Resections for Breast-Conserving Therapy of Breast Carcinomas
Clough, K. B., Lewis, J. S., Couturaud, B., Fitoussi, A., Nos, C., & Falcou, M.-C. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200301000-00005 · Cited by 608
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer
Goldhirsch, A., Glick, J. H., Gelber, R. D., & Senn, H.-J. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.21.1601 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, B., Dignam, J., Wolmark, N., Mamounas, E., Costantino, J., Poller, W., Fisher, E. R., Wickerham, D. L., Deutsch, M., Margolese, R., Dimitrov, N., & Kavanah, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 441-452
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1923770335
- Cited by
- 894
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.441
- The paper
- Fisher, B., Dignam, J., Wolmark, N., Mamounas, E., Costantino, J., Poller, W., Fisher, E. R., Wickerham, D. L., Deutsch, M., Margolese, R., Dimitrov, N., & Kavanah, M. (1998). Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.