Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occult Ovarian Tumors in Women With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Undergoing Prophylactic Oophorectomy

Lu, Karen H., Garber, Judy E., Cramer, Daniel W., Welch, William R., Niloff, Jonathan, Schrag, Deborah, Berkowitz, Ross S., Muto, Michael G.·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the findings at prophylactic oophorectomy of a series of women who presented to a familial breast and ovarian cancer clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from medical charts, operative notes, and pathology reports were collected on women who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomies because of the elevated risk of ovarian cancer. Because only a subset of patients underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, each patient’s risk of hereditary predisposition was calculated using the Berry-Parmigiani model and family history data. RESULTS: From June 1989 to December 1998, 50 women seen at our clinic underwent prophylactic oophorectomy, 33 of whom had a calculated risk of carrying a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation greater than 25%. Among this group, four incidental tumors were found (four of 33, or 12%); one tumor was noted at the time of surgery and three were noted only in the final pathology. Two patients had microscopic, poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinomas in multiple sites on both ovaries. A third patient had a bilateral serous borderline tumor with micropapillary features. The fourth patient had a microscopic serous borderline ovarian tumor. All four patients had germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and three had unremarkable transvaginal ultrasonography examinations within 6 months before prophylactic surgery. CONCLUSION: Foci of malignant tumor are not uncommon in prophylactic oophorectomies performed in women at very high risk for ovarian cancer and may not be detected on ultrasonograms. Surgeons should have a high suspicion of finding cancer in these women at the time of prophylactic surgery, and careful pathologic assessment of the specimens should be conducted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2728

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Lu, K. H., Garber, J. E., Cramer, D. W., Welch, W. R., Niloff, J., Schrag, D., Berkowitz, R. S., & Muto, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-07-14
Volume
18
Issue
14
Pages
2728-2732
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1905467809
Cited by
180
References
2
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occult Ovarian Tumors in Women With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Undergoing Prophylactic Oophorectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2728
The paper
Lu, K. H., Garber, J. E., Cramer, D. W., Welch, W. R., Niloff, J., Schrag, D., Berkowitz, R. S., & Muto, M. G. (2000). Occult Ovarian Tumors in Women With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Undergoing Prophylactic Oophorectomy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2728

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.