Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations

Pierce, Lori J., Strawderman, Myla, Narod, Steven A., Oliviotto, Ivo, Eisen, Andrea, Dawson, Laura, Gaffney, David, Solin, Lawrence J., Nixon, Asa, Garber, Judy, Berg, Christine, Isaacs, Claudine, Heimann, Ruth, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Haffty, Bruce, Weber, Barbara L.·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent laboratory data suggest a role for BRCA1/2 in the cellular response to DNA damage. There is a paucity of clinical data, however, examining the effect of radiotherapy (RT), which causes double-strand breaks, on breast tissue from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Thus the goals of this study were to compare rates of radiation-associated complications, in-breast tumor recurrence, and distant relapse in women with BRCA1/2 mutations treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using RT with rates observed in sporadic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and stage I or II breast cancer treated with BCT were matched 1:3 with 213 women with sporadic breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression models were used to compare matched cohorts for rates of complications and recurrence. RESULTS: Tumors from women in the genetic cohort were associated with high histologic (P = .0004) and nuclear (P = .009) grade and negative estrogen (P = .0001) and progesterone (P = .002) receptors compared with tumors from the sporadic cohort. Using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity scoring, there were no significant differences in acute or chronic morbidity in skin, subcutaneous tissue, lung, or bone. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, relapse-free survival, and rates of tumor control in the treated breast for the patients in the genetic cohort were 86%, 78%, and 98%, respectively, compared with 91%, 80%, and 96%, respectively, for the sporadic cohort (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of increased radiation sensitivity or sequelae in breast tissue heterozygous for a BRCA1/2 germline mutation compared with controls, and rates of tumor control in the breast and survival were comparable between BRCA1/2 carriers and controls at 5 years. Although additional follow-up is needed, these data may help in discussing treatment options in the management of early-stage hereditary breast cancer and should provide reassurance regarding the safety of administering RT to carriers of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3360

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1126/science.2270482 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.7545954 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/378789a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  5. 10.1038/386804a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81847-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/ng0695-208 · DOI
  8. Tonin P, Weber B, Offit K, et al: Frequency of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer families. Nat Med 2: 179,1996-183, · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91485-3 · DOI
  10. 10.1056/NEJM199705153362002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00023-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00464-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90895-O · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90782-Y · DOI
  17. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960215)77:4<697::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970801)80:3<435::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10109-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.1995.tb00241.x · DOI
  21. 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.6.2045 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.1996.tb00104.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90773-W · DOI
  24. 10.1093/jnci/91.24.2112 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)90002-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3017 · DOI
  27. 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3007 · DOI
  28. 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1969 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/jnci/84.16.1245 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116565 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/bjc.1985.196 · DOI
  32. 10.1056/NEJM199203193261201 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/BF00348194 · DOI
  34. 10.1056/NEJM198503143121101 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90179-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00132-7 · DOI
  37. 10.1056/NEJM199901143400201 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11423-4 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/jnci/90.18.1371 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/jnci/91.17.1475 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Pierce, L. J., Strawderman, M., Narod, S. A., Oliviotto, I., Eisen, A., Dawson, L., Gaffney, D., Solin, L. J., Nixon, A., Garber, J., Berg, C., Isaacs, C., Heimann, R., Olopade, O. I., Haffty, B., & Weber, B. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-10-19
Volume
18
Issue
19
Pages
3360-3369
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1828494712
Cited by
268
References
5
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3360
The paper
Pierce, L. J., Strawderman, M., Narod, S. A., Oliviotto, I., Eisen, A., Dawson, L., Gaffney, D., Solin, L. J., Nixon, A., Garber, J., Berg, C., Isaacs, C., Heimann, R., Olopade, O. I., Haffty, B., & Weber, B. L. (2000). Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Treatment in Women With Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.