The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrition and Survival After the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Review of the Evidence
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review and summarize evidence from clinical and epidemiologic studies that have examined the relationship between nutritional factors, survival, and recurrence after the diagnosis of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant clinical and epidemiologic studies were identified through a MEDLINE search. References of identified reports also were used to identify additional published articles for critical review. RESULTS: Several nutritional factors modify the progression of disease and prognosis after the diagnosis of breast cancer. Overweight or obesity is associated with poorer prognosis in the majority of the studies that have examined this relationship. Treatment-related weight gain also may influence disease-free survival, reduce quality of life, and increase risk for comorbid conditions. Five of 12 studies that examined the relationship between dietary fat and survival found an inverse association, which was not evident on energy adjustment in most of these studies. The majority of the studies that examined intakes of vegetables or nutrients provided by vegetables and fruit found an inverse relationship with survival. Alcohol intake was not associated with survival in the majority of the studies that examined this relationship. CONCLUSION: Much remains to be learned about the role of nutritional factors in survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer. Healthy weight control with an emphasis on exercise to preserve or increase lean muscle mass and a diet that includes nutrient-rich vegetables can be recommended. Diets that have adequate vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and low-fat dairy foods and that are low in saturated fat may help to lower overall disease risk in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
WILLETT, W., & STAMPFER, M. J. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366 · Cited by 2,751
Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Doyle, C., Bandera, E. V., McCullough, M., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., Thun, M. J., & The American Cancer Society 2006 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2006) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254 · Cited by 1,901
Byers, T., Nestle, M., McTiernan, A., Doyle, C., Currie-Williams, A., Gansler, T., & Thun, M. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.2.92 · Cited by 336
BLACK, A. E., & COLE, T. J. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00018-9 · Cited by 249
Clinical detection of sarcopenic obesity by bioelectrical impedance analysis
Heber, D., Ingles, S., Ashley, J., Maxwell, M., Lyons, R., & Elashoff, R. (1996) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/64.3.472s · Cited by 198
Cited by
Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms
Calle, E. E., & Kaaks, R. (2004) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1408 · Cited by 3,613
Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors
Rock, C. L., Doyle, C., Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Meyerhardt, J., Courneya, K. S., Schwartz, A. L., Bandera, E. V., Hamilton, K. K., Grant, B., McCullough, M., et al. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21142 · Cited by 1,995
“Dietary supplement use is reported by 52% of US adults(142) and studies report ranges between 64% and 81% among cancer survivors.(98,143) A recent systematic review indicates that 14% to 32% of cancer survivors initiate supplement use after their diagnosis.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationDoyle, C., Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Courneya, K. S., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Grant, B., McTiernan, A., Rock, C. L., Thompson, C., Gansler, T., et al. (2006) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.6.323 · Cited by 950
Self-citationPierce, J. P., Natarajan, L., Caan, B. J., Parker, B. A., Greenberg, E. R., Flatt, S. W., Rock, C. L., Kealey, S., Al-Delaimy, W. K., Bardwell, W. A., et al. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.289 · Cited by 734
Self-citationWeight, Weight Gain, and Survival After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Kroenke, C. H., Chen, W. Y., Rosner, B., & Holmes, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.079 · Cited by 670
Metadata
- Authors
- Rock, C. L., & Demark-Wahnefried, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3302-3316
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2012712610
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrition and Survival After the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Review of the Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.03.008
- The paper
- Rock, C. L., & Demark-Wahnefried, W. (2002). Nutrition and Survival After the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Review of the Evidence. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.03.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.