Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage and Mast-Cell Invasion of Tumor Cell Islets Confers a Marked Survival Advantage in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Welsh, Tomas J., Green, Ruth H., Richardson, Donna, Waller, David A., O'Byrne, Kenneth J., Bradding, Peter·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The role played by the innate immune system in determining survival from non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of macrophage and mast-cell infiltration in NSCLC. Methods: We used immunohistochemistry to identify tryptase+ mast cells and CD68+ macrophages in the tumor stroma and tumor islets in 175 patients with surgically resected NSCLC. Results: Macrophages were detected in both the tumor stroma and islets in all patients. Mast cells were detected in the stroma and islets in 99.4% and 68.5% of patients, respectively. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, increasing tumor islet macrophage density (P < .001) and tumor islet/stromal macrophage ratio (P < .001) emerged as favorable independent prognostic indicators. In contrast, increasing stromal macrophage density was an independent predictor of reduced survival (P = .001). The presence of tumor islet mast cells (P = .018) and increasing islet/stromal mast-cell ratio (P = .032) were also favorable independent prognostic indicators. Macrophage islet density showed the strongest effect: 5-year survival was 52.9% in patients with an islet macrophage density greater than the median versus 7.7% when less than the median (P < .0001). In the same groups, respectively, median survival was 2,244 versus 334 days (P < .0001). Patients with a high islet macrophage density but incomplete resection survived markedly longer than patients with a low islet macrophage density but complete resection. Conclusion: The tumor islet CD68+ macrophage density is a powerful independent predictor of survival from surgically resected NSCLC. The biologic explanation for this and its implications for the use of adjunctive treatment requires further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.01.4910

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Welsh, T. J., Green, R. H., Richardson, D., Waller, D. A., O'Byrne, K. J., & Bradding, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-12-10
Volume
23
Issue
35
Pages
8959-8967
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1606413143
Cited by
369
References
1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.