Cited by 159Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Persistence of Restrictions in Quality of Life From the First to the Third Year After Diagnosis in Women With Breast Cancer

Open access
Arndt, Volker, Merx, Henrike, Stegmaier, Christa, Ziegler, Hartwig, Brenner, Hermann·2005·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether detriments in quality of life (QOL) among women with breast cancer persist over years. Patients and Methods: QOL was assessed in a population-based cohort of 314 women with breast cancer from Saarland (Germany) 1 and 3 years after diagnosis and compared internally and with reference data from the general population. Results: Three years after diagnosis, deficits in QOL were still apparent for role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning and for the symptoms of insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, and financial difficulties. Differences between breast cancer patients and women from the general population were predominantly found in younger ages. Compared with the QOL scores measured 1 year after diagnosis, only minor functional changes were observed, but recurrence of breast cancer during the follow-up interval had a deleterious effect on QOL. Conclusion: Deficits in role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning persist over years in women with breast cancer and predominantly affect younger patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.03.475

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnosis and treatment of breast and gynaecologic cancers are associated with high rates of often persistent psychological distress and ongoing challenges to quality of life.

    “Diagnosis and treatment of these cancers are associated with high rates of often persistent psychological distress and ongoing challenges to quality of life (QOL) [1,6,9,10,12].”

    From Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Discussion reports that deficits in emotional and social functioning persist for years after breast cancer diagnosis, supporting ongoing psychological and quality-of-life challenges in that population. The paper does not address gynaecologic cancers or establish a high rate of psychological distress across both cancer groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The DASS-21 has confirmed internal consistency and concurrent validity.

    “Internal consistency and concurrent validity of the DASS-21 have been confirmed [1,13].”

    From Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study (2015) · cites this paper as [1]

    The QOL Questionnaire section identifies the instruments used as the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, not the DASS-21. Searches for DASS-21, internal consistency, and concurrent validity found no passage in our copy addressing the DASS-21’s psychometric properties; the paper is not truncated. No page number is available for the cited section. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arndt, V., Merx, H., Stegmaier, C., Ziegler, H., & Brenner, H.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
23
Issue
22
Pages
4945-4953
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2162083820
Cited by
159
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • German Medical Science (German Research Foundation) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Deutsche Krebshilfe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
breast cancer, quality of life, long-term follow-up, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive function, social functioning, fatigue, insomnia, dyspnea, financial hardship, tumor recurrence, age differences, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review