Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a Phase II Study

Chanan-Khan, Asher, Miller, Kena C., Musial, Laurie, Lawrence, David, Padmanabhan, Swaminathan, Takeshita, Kenichi, Porter, Carl W., Goodrich, David W., Bernstein, Zale P., Wallace, Paul, Spaner, David, Mohr, Alice, Byrne, Catriona, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Francisco, Chrystal, Cynthia, Starostik, Petr, Czuczman, Myron S.·2006·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have profound immune defects and limited treatment options. Given the dramatic activity of lenalidomide in other B-cell malignancies and its pleotropic immunomodulatory effects, we conducted a phase II trial of this agent in CLL. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell CLL (B-CLL) were eligible if they required treatment as per the National Cancer Institute Working Group 1996 guidelines. Lenalidomide was administered orally at 25 mg on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle. Response was assessed after each cycle. Patients were to continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete remission. Rituximab was added to lenalidomide on disease progression. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years. Sixty-four percent of the patients had Rai stage III or IV disease, and 51% were refractory to fludarabine. The overall response rate was 47%, with 9% of the patients attaining a complete remission. Fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse effects noted in 83%, 78%, and 78% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Lenalidomide is clinically active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-CLL. These findings are encouraging and warrant further investigation of this agent in the treatment of this disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2005.05.0401

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Chanan-Khan, A., Miller, K. C., Musial, L., Lawrence, D., Padmanabhan, S., Takeshita, K., Porter, C. W., Goodrich, D. W., Bernstein, Z. P., Wallace, P., Spaner, D., Mohr, A., Byrne, C., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., Chrystal, C., Starostik, P., & Czuczman, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2006-12-01
Volume
24
Issue
34
Pages
5343-5349
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2136242714
Cited by
414
References
29
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a Phase II Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.05.0401
The paper
Chanan-Khan, A., Miller, K. C., Musial, L., Lawrence, D., Padmanabhan, S., Takeshita, K., Porter, C. W., Goodrich, D. W., Bernstein, Z. P., Wallace, P., Spaner, D., Mohr, A., Byrne, C., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., Chrystal, C., Starostik, P., & Czuczman, M. S. (2006). Clinical Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a Phase II Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.05.0401

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.