The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2004
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To update the 2003 American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors. Recommendations: Based on results from multiple large randomized trials, adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer should include an aromatase inhibitor in order to lower the risk of tumor recurrence. Neither the optimal timing nor duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy is established. Aromatase inhibitors are appropriate as initial treatment for women with contraindications to tamoxifen. For all other postmenopausal women, treatment options include 5 years of aromatase inhibitors treatment or sequential therapy consisting of tamoxifen (for either 2 to 3 years or 5 years) followed by aromatase inhibitors for 2 to 3, or 5 years. Patients intolerant of aromatase inhibitors should receive tamoxifen. There are no data on the use of tamoxifen after an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. Women with hormone receptor–negative tumors should not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. The role of other biomarkers such as progesterone receptor and HER2 status in selecting optimal endocrine therapy remains controversial. Aromatase inhibitors are contraindicated in premenopausal women; there are limited data concerning their role in women with treatment-related amenorrhea. The side effect profiles of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors differ. The late consequences of aromatase inhibitor therapy, including osteoporosis, are not well characterized. Conclusion: The Panel believes that optimal adjuvant hormonal therapy for a postmenopausal woman with receptor-positive breast cancer includes an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy or after treatment with tamoxifen. Women with breast cancer and their physicians must weigh the risks and benefits of all therapeutic options.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coombes, R. C., Hall, E., Gibson, L. J., Paridaens, R., Jassem, J., Delozier, T., Jones, S. E., Alvarez, I., Bertelli, G., Ortmann, O., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040331 · Cited by 1,759
Mitwally, M. F. M., & Casper, R. F. (2001) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01705-2 · Cited by 800
Geisler, J., Haynes, B., Anker, G., Dowsett, M., & Lønning, P. E. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.3.751 · Cited by 604
Buzdar, A., Jonat, W., Howell, A., Jones, S. E., Blomqvist, C., Vogel, C. L., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J. M., Azab, M., Webster, A., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.7.2000 · Cited by 406
Cited by
Goss, P. E., Ingle, J. N., Martino, S., Robert, N. J., Muss, H. B., Piccart, M. J., Castiglione, M., Tu, D., Shepherd, L. E., Pritchard, K. I., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032312 · Cited by 1,795
Self-citationPractice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Hershman, D. L., Shao, T., Kushi, L. H., Buono, D., Tsai, W. Y., Fehrenbacher, L., Kwan, M., Gomez, S. L., & Neugut, A. I. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1132-4 · Cited by 870
Hirsch, F. R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., Franklin, W. A., Dziadziuszko, R., Thatcher, N., Chang, A., Parikh, P., Pereira, J. R., Ciuleanu, T., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.3958 · Cited by 703
Anderson, B. O., Shyyan, R., Eniu, A., Smith, R. A., Yip, C.-H., Bese, N. S., Chow, L. W. C., Masood, S., Ramsey, S. D., & Carlson, R. W. (2006) · The Breast Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1075-122x.2006.00199.x · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Winer, E. P., Hudis, C., Burstein, H. J., Wolff, A. C., Pritchard, K. I., Ingle, J. N., Chlebowski, R. T., Gelber, R., Edge, S. B., Gralow, J., Cobleigh, M. A., Mamounas, E. P., Goldstein, L. J., Whelan, T. J., Powles, T. J., Bryant, J., Perkins, C., Perotti, J., Braun, S., Langer, A. S., Browman, G. P., & Somerfield, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2005-01-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 619-629
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2151447010
- Cited by
- 1,031
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 49.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2005.09.121
- The paper
- Winer, E. P., Hudis, C., Burstein, H. J., Wolff, A. C., Pritchard, K. I., Ingle, J. N., Chlebowski, R. T., Gelber, R., Edge, S. B., Gralow, J., Cobleigh, M. A., Mamounas, E. P., Goldstein, L. J., Whelan, T. J., Powles, T. J., Bryant, J., Perkins, C., Perotti, J., Braun, S., . . . Somerfield, M. R. (2005). American Society of Clinical Oncology Technology Assessment on the Use of Aromatase Inhibitors As Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Status Report 2004. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.09.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
