Cited by 1,241Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

Open access
Falcone, Alfredo, Ricci, Sergio, Brunetti, Isa, Pfanner, Elisabetta, Allegrini, Giacomo, Barbara, Cecilia, Crinò, Lucio, Benedetti, Giovanni +12 more·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m 2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m 2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods: Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results: A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion: The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.09.0928

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For patients deemed able to tolerate more aggressive therapy, the inclusion of both irinotecan and oxaliplatin together with 5-FU/LV in FOLFOXFIRI triplet chemotherapy improved ORR, PFS, and median OS relative to doublet therapy.

    “For patients deemed able to tolerate more aggressive therapy, the inclusion of both irinotecan and oxaliplatin together with 5-FU/LV in FOLFOXFIRI triplet chemotherapy improved ORR, PFS, and median OS relative to doublet therapy [142].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Colorectal cancer, in Steward BW, Kleihues P (eds): World Cancer Report. Lyon, France, IACR Press, 2003, pp 198-202

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falcone, A., Ricci, S., Brunetti, I., Pfanner, E., Allegrini, G., Barbara, C., Crinò, L., Benedetti, G., Evangelista, W., Fanchini, L., Cortesi, E., Picone, V., Vitello, S., Chiara, S., Granetto, C., Porcile, G., Fioretto, L., Orlandini, C., Andreuccetti, M., & Masi, G.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di Macerata (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
25
Issue
13
Pages
1670-1676
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2106845199
Cited by
1,241
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 87
FWCI
37.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, FOLFOXIRI, FOLFIRI, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, first-line chemotherapy, response rate, peripheral neurotoxicity, neutropenia, diarrhea, liver metastasis, secondary resection, treatment toxicity
MeSH terms
Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Leucovorin, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organoplatinum Compounds, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review