The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Practical Approach to Geriatric Assessment in Oncology
Abstract
More than half of new cancers are diagnosed in elderly patients, but data from randomized clinical trials do not represent the elderly population. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can contribute valuable information to oncologists for risk stratification of elderly cancer patients. Functional impairments, frailty markers, cognitive impairments, and physical disabilities increase the risk for adverse outcomes during cancer treatment. Evidence is accumulating that selected elderly cancer patients benefit from CGA and geriatric interventions. However, perceived barriers to CGA include time, familiarity, cost, and lack of a well-defined procedure to interpret and apply the information. We present a model for rapid selection of elderly who would benefit from CGA using screening tools such as the Vulnerable Elders-13 Survey. We also define important geriatric functional risk factors, including mobility limitation, frailty, and dementia, and demonstrate how brief screening tests can make use of data realistically available to clinical oncologists to determine a stage of aging. Summary tables and a decision tree demonstrate how these data can be compiled to determine the risk for toxicities and to anticipate ancillary support needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x · Cited by 14,418
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.114.512.797 · Cited by 4,117
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Walston, J., Hadley, E. C., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Newman, A. B., Studenski, S. A., Ershler, W. B., Harris, T., & Fried, L. P. (2006) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00745.x · Cited by 1,605
Physical performance measures in the clinical setting
Studenski, S., Perera, S., Wallace, D., Chandler, J. M., Duncan, P. W., Rooney, E., Fox, M., & Guralnik, J. M. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51104.x · Cited by 1,218
Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons
Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Allore, H. G., & Han, L. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.4.418 · Cited by 1,141
Fried, L. P. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.585 · Cited by 1,107
Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients:
Extermann, M., Aapro, M., Bernabei, R., Cohen, H. J., Droz, J.-P., Lichtman, S., Mor, V., Monfardini, S., Repetto, L., Sørbye, L., et al. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003 · Cited by 1,098
Cited by
Mohile, S. G., Dale, W., Somerfield, M. R., Schonberg, M. A., Boyd, C. M., Burhenn, P. S., Canin, B., Cohen, H. J., Holmes, H. M., Hopkins, J. O., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.78.8687 · Cited by 1,479
Self-citationSoubeyran, P., Bellera, C., Goyard, J., Heitz, D., Curé, H., Rousselot, H., Albrand, G., Servent, V., Jean, O. S., van Praagh, I., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115060 · Cited by 601
Quoix, E., Zalcman, G., Oster, J.-P., Westeel, V., Pichon, E., Lavolé, A., Dauba, J., Debieuvre, D., Souquet, P.-J., Bigay-Game, L., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60780-0 · Cited by 566
EORTC elderly task force position paper: Approach to the older cancer patient
Pallis, A. G., Fortpied, C., Wedding, U., Van Nes, M. C., Penninckx, B., Ring, A., Lacombe, D., Monfardini, S., Scalliet, P., & Wildiers, H. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.022 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodin, M. B., & Mohile, S. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1936-1944
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2063861120
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Practical Approach to Geriatric Assessment in Oncology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2954
- The paper
- Rodin, M. B., & Mohile, S. G. (2007). A Practical Approach to Geriatric Assessment in Oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.10.2954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
