Cited by 566Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial

Quoix, Elisabeth, Zalcman, Gérard, Oster, Jean-Philippe, Westeel, Virginie, Pichon, Eric, Lavolé, Armelle, Dauba, Jérôme, Debieuvre, Didier +15 more·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in fit, non-elderly adults, but monotherapy is recommended for patients older than 70 years. We compared a carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy regimen with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.Methods In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial we recruited patients aged 70-89 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and WHO performance status scores of 0-2. Patients received either four cycles (3 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of carboplatin (on day 1) plus paclitaxel (on days 1, 8, and 15) or five cycles (2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number NCT00298415.Findings 451 patients were enrolled. 226 were randomly assigned monotherapy and 225 doublet chemotherapy. Median age was 77 years and median follow-up was 30.3 months (range 8.6-45.2). Median overall survival was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78; p<0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% (95% CI 37.9-50.9) and 25.4% (19.9-31.3), respectively. Toxic effects were more frequent in the doublet chemotherapy group than in the monotherapy group (most frequent, decreased neutrophil count (108 [48.4%] vs 28 [12.4%]; asthenia 23 [10.3%] vs 13 [5.8%]).Interpretation Despite increased toxic effects, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits compared with vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. We feel that the current treatment paradigm for these patients should be reconsidered.Funding Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Institut National du Cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60780-0

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quoix, E., Zalcman, G., Oster, J.-P., Westeel, V., Pichon, E., Lavolé, A., Dauba, J., Debieuvre, D., Souquet, P.-J., Bigay-Game, L., Dansin, E., Poudenx, M., Molinier, O., Vaylet, F., Moro-Sibilot, D., Herman, D., Bennouna, J., Tredaniel, J., Ducoloné, A., Lebitasy, M.-P., Baudrin, L., Laporte, S., & Milleron, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
  • Hopitaux Civils de Colmar (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Hôpital Lyon Sud (FR)
  • Hôpital Larrey (FR)
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier du Mans (FR)
  • Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Percy (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Agglomération de Nevers (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
378
Issue
9796
Pages
1079-1088
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2121095198
Cited by
566
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 50
FWCI
44.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Microcirculation Society
  • Roche
  • Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, elderly patients, carboplatin, paclitaxel, doublet chemotherapy, gemcitabine monotherapy, overall survival, platinum-based chemotherapy, chemotherapy toxicity, neutropenia, metastatic lung cancer, locally advanced lung cancer, performance status
MeSH terms
Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Adenocarcinoma, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Deoxycytidine, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Vinblastine, Survival Rate, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review