Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Owonikoko, Taofeek K., Ragin, Camille C., Belani, Chandra P., Oton, Ana B., Gooding, William E., Taioli, Emanuela, Ramalingam, Suresh S.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To study the burden and outcome of lung cancer in the elderly, particularly for patients aged 80 years and older. Patients and Methods: The national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was analyzed for lung cancer outcomes during the period 1988 to 2003. A comparison was carried out between patients with lung cancer 80 years and older, 70 to 79 years, and younger than 70 years for demographics; stage distribution; 5-year relative survival; and survival based on histology, sex, race, stage, and treatment. The temporal trends in survival during the years 1988 to 1997 and 1998 to 2003 were also analyzed. Results: Of 316,682 patients eligible for the analysis, 45,912 (14%) were 80 years or older (ie, very elderly); 103,963 (33%) were 70 to 79 years; and 166,807 (53%) were younger than 70 years. The distribution by stage and histology was comparable for all the three groups. Overall survival rate at 5 years was lower in the very elderly (7.4% v 12.3% v 15.5%; P < .0001) across sex, histologic subtypes, stages, and racial categories. Patients aged 80 years or older were less likely to receive local therapy (no surgery or radiation) than younger patients (47% v 28% and 19% for the age subgroups ≥ 80 years, 70 to 79 years, and < 70 years, respectively). Overall outcomes for patients who underwent surgical therapy or radiation were comparable across the three age groups. In general, survival outcomes for the subgroup aged 70 to 79 years were similar to those of the subgroup aged 80 years and older who received single modality local therapy. Conclusion: Patients 80 years or older account for 14% (70 years or older accounted for 47%) of all lung cancers, are less likely to be subjected to surgery or radiation, and have inferior outcomes when compared with younger patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.12.5435

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Owonikoko, T. K., Ragin, C. C., Belani, C. P., Oton, A. B., Gooding, W. E., Taioli, E., & Ramalingam, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2007-12-10
Volume
25
Issue
35
Pages
5570-5577
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2101751898
Cited by
566
References
25
FWCI
16.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2007.12.5435
The paper
Owonikoko, T. K., Ragin, C. C., Belani, C. P., Oton, A. B., Gooding, W. E., Taioli, E., & Ramalingam, S. S. (2007). Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.12.5435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.