Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Significance of Focal Lesions in Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Hillengass, Jens, Fechtner, Kerstin, Weber, Marc-André, Bäuerle, Tobias, Ayyaz, Sofia, Heiss, Christiane, Hielscher, Thomas, Moehler, Thomas M., Egerer, Gerlinde, Neben, Kai, Ho, Anthony D., Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Delorme, Stefan, Goldschmidt, Hartmut·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: With whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI), almost the whole bone marrow compartment can be examined in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease. Focal lesions (FLs) detected by spinal MRI have been of prognostic significance in symptomatic multiple myeloma (sMM). In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of FLs in wb-MRI in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma (aMM). Patients and Methods: Wb-MRI was performed in 149 patients with aMM. The prognostic significance of the presence and absence, as well as the number, of FLs for progression into sMM was analyzed. Results: FLs were present in 28% of patients. The presence per se of FLs and a number of greater than one FL were the strongest adverse prognostic factors for progression into sMM (P < .001) in multivariate analysis. A diffuse infiltration pattern in MRI, a monoclonal protein of 40 g/L or greater, and a plasma cell infiltration in bone marrow of 20% or greater were other adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival in univariate analysis. Conclusion: We recommend use of wb-MRI for risk stratification of patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.25.5356

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Hillengass, J., Fechtner, K., Weber, M.-A., Bäuerle, T., Ayyaz, S., Heiss, C., Hielscher, T., Moehler, T. M., Egerer, G., Neben, K., Ho, A. D., Kauczor, H.-U., Delorme, S., & Goldschmidt, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-03-20
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1606-1610
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2158749770
Cited by
381
References
1
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of Focal Lesions in Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.25.5356
The paper
Hillengass, J., Fechtner, K., Weber, M.-A., Bäuerle, T., Ayyaz, S., Heiss, C., Hielscher, T., Moehler, T. M., Egerer, G., Neben, K., Ho, A. D., Kauczor, H.-U., Delorme, S., & Goldschmidt, H. (2010). Prognostic Significance of Focal Lesions in Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.5356

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.