Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Plus Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma

Open access
Kindler, Hedy L., Karrison, Theodore G., Gandara, David R., Lu, Charles, Krug, Lee M., Stevenson, James P., Jänne, Pasi A., Quinn, David I., Koczywas, Marianna N., Brahmer, Julie R., Albain, Kathy S., Taber, David A., Armato, Samuel G., Vogelzang, Nicholas J., Chen, Helen X., Stadler, Walter M., Vokes, Everett E.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active in malignant mesothelioma (MM), although single-arm phase II trials have reported variable outcomes. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors have activity against MM in preclinical models. We added the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial in patients with previously untreated, unresectable MM. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 and no thrombosis, bleeding, or major blood vessel invasion. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified by ECOG performance status (0 v 1) and histologic subtype (epithelial v other). Patients received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 every 21 days, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or placebo every 21 days for six cycles, and then bevacizumab or placebo every 21 days until progression. Results: One hundred fifteen patients were enrolled at 11 sites; 108 patients were evaluable. Median PFS time was 6.9 months for the bevacizumab arm and 6.0 months for the placebo arm (P = .88). Median overall survival (OS) times were 15.6 and 14.7 months in the bevacizumab and placebo arms, respectively (P = .91). Partial response rates were similar (24.5% for bevacizumab v 21.8% for placebo; P = .74). A higher pretreatment plasma VEGF concentration (n = 56) was associated with shorter PFS (P = .02) and OS (P = .0066), independent of treatment arm. There were no statistically significant differences in toxicity of grade 3 or greater. Conclusion: The addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin in this trial did not significantly improve PFS or OS in patients with advanced MM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.41.5869

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Kindler, H. L., Karrison, T. G., Gandara, D. R., Lu, C., Krug, L. M., Stevenson, J. P., Jänne, P. A., Quinn, D. I., Koczywas, M. N., Brahmer, J. R., Albain, K. S., Taber, D. A., Armato, S. G., Vogelzang, N. J., Chen, H. X., Stadler, W. M., & Vokes, E. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-07-10
Volume
30
Issue
20
Pages
2509-2515
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2167527173
Cited by
257
References
38
FWCI
20.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Plus Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.41.5869
The paper
Kindler, H. L., Karrison, T. G., Gandara, D. R., Lu, C., Krug, L. M., Stevenson, J. P., Jänne, P. A., Quinn, D. I., Koczywas, M. N., Brahmer, J. R., Albain, K. S., Taber, D. A., Armato, S. G., Vogelzang, N. J., Chen, H. X., Stadler, W. M., & Vokes, E. E. (2012). Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Plus Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.41.5869

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.