Cited by 405Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Precision oncology: an overview

Open access
Garraway, Levi A., Verweij, Jaap, Ballman, Karla V.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

In this Special Series issue, Journal of Clinical Oncology presents a systematic assessment of cancer genomic information and its accelerating clinical impact. In the scientific literature and lay press, the relevant discipline is often called personalized, or precision, cancer medicine. The word personalized conveys the sense that cancer genomic data may facilitate rational treatment choices that are tailored to individual patients. The term precision refers to prospects for enhanced molecular resolution, mechanistic clarity, and therapeutic cogency that may accompany clinical implementation of genomics technologies. We have chosen the term genomics-driven cancer medicine in recognition of the fact that knowledge that emanates specifically from the cancer genome will likely continue to direct the opening act of precision oncology as it plays out in clinical and translational studies over the next several years. Although precision medicine will inevitably permeate many diseases (both cancer and noncancer), oncology arguably sits at its vanguard. One obvious reason is the fact that cancer is a genomic disease: most cancers harbor a cocktail of mutated (or otherwise altered) oncogenes and tumor suppressors that work in concert to specify the molecular pathways that lead to their genesis, maintenance, and progression. Toward this end, oncology research has benefitted immensely from the proliferation of worldwide efforts to characterize the genomes of thousands of cases spanning nearly all major cancer types. As described in the opening article of this Special Series issue, the same technologic and analytic advances that have enabled a comprehensive catalogue of cancer genes are becoming increasingly malleable for advanced clinical diagnostics. Together with the expanding compendium of targeted anticancer agents in clinical development or active use, oncology has served as a proving ground for the genomics-driven framework that is unique among medical specialties. Conceptually, the implementation of genomics-driven cancer medicine might seem straightforward (Fig 1): first, characterize the genomes of patients’ tumors using state-of-the-art technologies; second, filter the genomic data through a knowledge base of existing and emerging anticancer drugs; and third, present an annotated list to the treating oncologist that can be incorporated into clinical decision making. However, multiple challenges must be addressed to bring this ambitious goal to fruition. To begin with, high-quality genomic information must be obtained consistently in the diagnostic setting— often from sparse amounts of archival tumor tissue. The article by MacConaill reviews the remarkable technologic advances that make large-scale genomic data generation feasible in a clinical setting. Although questions persist regarding the extent of genomic data needed, the cost-effectiveness of various platforms, and how rapidly clinical genomic data can be delivered, it seems clear that available technologies for genome characterization are fast becoming equipped to meet the demands of precision oncology. The analytic challenges that accompany comprehensive genomic data have proven more problematic. The somatic and germline alterations that are relevant to each cancer must be identified with high

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.49.4799

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing availability of detailed longitudinal cancer patient data can be used to train AI models, and real-time access to such data can enable individualized clinically relevant predictions for precision oncology.

    “These data can be used to build and train AI models, and critically, the real-time availability of these data can enable individualized, clinically relevant AI predictions to further the goal of precision oncology (5).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garraway, L. A., Verweij, J., & Ballman, K. V.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
31
Issue
15
Pages
1803-1805
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2171756499
Cited by
405
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 8
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
precision oncology, cancer genomics, precision medicine, targeted therapy, tumor genomic profiling, clinical implementation of genomics, archival tumor tissue, genomic data analysis, clinical decision-making, anticancer drug repurposing, cancer stem cells
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Medical Oncology, Mutation, Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Translational Research, Biomedical, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review