Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement

Open access
Dimopoulos, Meletios A., Hillengass, Jens, Usmani, Saad, Zamagni, Elena, Lentzsch, Suzanne, Davies, Faith E., Raje, Noopur, Sezer, Orhan, Zweegman, Sonja, Shah, Jatin, Badros, Ashraf, Shimizu, Kazuyuki, Moreau, Philippe, Chim, Chor-Sang, Lahuerta, Juan José, Hou, Jian, Jurczyszyn, Artur, Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Sonneveld, Pieter, Palumbo, Antonio, Ludwig, Heinz, Cavo, Michele, Barlogie, Bart, Anderson, Kenneth, Roodman, G. David, Rajkumar, S. Vincent, Durie, Brian G.M., Terpos, Evangelos·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations for the value of MRI based on data published through March 2014. Recommendations: MRI has high sensitivity for the early detection of marrow infiltration by myeloma cells compared with other radiographic methods. Thus, MRI detects bone involvement in patients with myeloma much earlier than the myeloma-related bone destruction, with no radiation exposure. It is the gold standard for the imaging of axial skeleton, for the evaluation of painful lesions, and for distinguishing benign versus malignant osteoporotic vertebral fractures. MRI has the ability to detect spinal cord or nerve compression and presence of soft tissue masses, and it is recommended for the workup of solitary bone plasmacytoma. Regarding smoldering or asymptomatic myeloma, all patients should undergo whole-body MRI (WB-MRI; or spine and pelvic MRI if WB-MRI is not available), and if they have > one focal lesion of a diameter > 5 mm, they should be considered to have symptomatic disease that requires therapy. In cases of equivocal small lesions, a second MRI should be performed after 3 to 6 months, and if there is progression on MRI, the patient should be treated as having symptomatic myeloma. MRI at diagnosis of symptomatic patients and after treatment (mainly after autologous stem-cell transplantation) provides prognostic information; however, to date, this does not change treatment selection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.57.9961

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Dimopoulos, M. A., Hillengass, J., Usmani, S., Zamagni, E., Lentzsch, S., Davies, F. E., Raje, N., Sezer, O., Zweegman, S., Shah, J., Badros, A., Shimizu, K., Moreau, P., Chim, C.-S., Lahuerta, J. J., Hou, J., Jurczyszyn, A., Goldschmidt, H., Sonneveld, P., Palumbo, A., Ludwig, H., Cavo, M., Barlogie, B., Anderson, K., Roodman, G. D., Rajkumar, S. V., Durie, B. G. M., & Terpos, E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-02-20
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
657-664
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2096672426
Cited by
393
References
2
FWCI
33.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9961
The paper
Dimopoulos, M. A., Hillengass, J., Usmani, S., Zamagni, E., Lentzsch, S., Davies, F. E., Raje, N., Sezer, O., Zweegman, S., Shah, J., Badros, A., Shimizu, K., Moreau, P., Chim, C.-S., Lahuerta, J. J., Hou, J., Jurczyszyn, A., Goldschmidt, H., Sonneveld, P., . . . Terpos, E. (2015). Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9961

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.