The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations for the value of MRI based on data published through March 2014. Recommendations: MRI has high sensitivity for the early detection of marrow infiltration by myeloma cells compared with other radiographic methods. Thus, MRI detects bone involvement in patients with myeloma much earlier than the myeloma-related bone destruction, with no radiation exposure. It is the gold standard for the imaging of axial skeleton, for the evaluation of painful lesions, and for distinguishing benign versus malignant osteoporotic vertebral fractures. MRI has the ability to detect spinal cord or nerve compression and presence of soft tissue masses, and it is recommended for the workup of solitary bone plasmacytoma. Regarding smoldering or asymptomatic myeloma, all patients should undergo whole-body MRI (WB-MRI; or spine and pelvic MRI if WB-MRI is not available), and if they have > one focal lesion of a diameter > 5 mm, they should be considered to have symptomatic disease that requires therapy. In cases of equivocal small lesions, a second MRI should be performed after 3 to 6 months, and if there is progression on MRI, the patient should be treated as having symptomatic myeloma. MRI at diagnosis of symptomatic patients and after treatment (mainly after autologous stem-cell transplantation) provides prognostic information; however, to date, this does not change treatment selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Mateos, M.-V., Hernández, M.-T., Giraldo, P., de la Rubia, J., de Arriba, F., Corral, L. L., Rosiñol, L., Paiva, B., Palomera, L., Bargay, J., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1300439 · Cited by 1,171 · cited 1×
“03).(61) An important issue is whether patients who have two small focal lesions ( 5 mm) should be considered as having symptomatic myeloma and how to manage them.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDhodapkar, M. V., Sexton, R., Waheed, S., Usmani, S., Papanikolaou, X., Nair, B., Petty, N., Shaughnessy, J. D., Hoering, A., Crowley, J., et al. (2014) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-07-515239 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Cited by
Kumar, S., Paiva, B., Anderson, K. C., Durie, B., Landgren, O., Moreau, P., Munshi, N., Lonial, S., Bladé, J., Mateos, M.-V., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30206-6 · Cited by 3,061
Self-citationMultiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†
Dimopoulos, M. A., Moreau, P., Terpos, E., Mateos, M. V., Zweegman, S., Cook, G., Delforge, M., Hájek, R., Schjesvold, F., Cavo, M., et al. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014 · Cited by 900
Self-citationCavo, M., Terpos, E., Nanni, C., Moreau, P., Lentzsch, S., Zweegman, S., Hillengass, J., Engelhardt, M., Usmani, S. Z., Vesole, D. H., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30189-4 · Cited by 544
Self-citationUpdated Diagnostic Criteria and Staging System for Multiple Myeloma
Rajkumar, S. V. (2016) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_159009 · Cited by 350
Self-citationCaers, J., Paiva, B., Zamagni, E., Leleu, X., Bladé, J., Kristinsson, S. Y., Touzeau, C., Abildgaard, N., Terpos, E., Heusschen, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-017-0549-1 · Cited by 336
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimopoulos, M. A., Hillengass, J., Usmani, S., Zamagni, E., Lentzsch, S., Davies, F. E., Raje, N., Sezer, O., Zweegman, S., Shah, J., Badros, A., Shimizu, K., Moreau, P., Chim, C.-S., Lahuerta, J. J., Hou, J., Jurczyszyn, A., Goldschmidt, H., Sonneveld, P., Palumbo, A., Ludwig, H., Cavo, M., Barlogie, B., Anderson, K., Roodman, G. D., Rajkumar, S. V., Durie, B. G. M., & Terpos, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-02-20
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 657-664
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2096672426
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9961
- The paper
- Dimopoulos, M. A., Hillengass, J., Usmani, S., Zamagni, E., Lentzsch, S., Davies, F. E., Raje, N., Sezer, O., Zweegman, S., Shah, J., Badros, A., Shimizu, K., Moreau, P., Chim, C.-S., Lahuerta, J. J., Hou, J., Jurczyszyn, A., Goldschmidt, H., Sonneveld, P., . . . Terpos, E. (2015). Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.57.9961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.