Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of Clinical Response and Minimal Residual Disease and Their Prognostic Impact on Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Chen, Xueyan, Xie, Hu, Wood, Brent L., Walter, Roland B., Pagel, John M., Becker, Pamela S., Sandhu, Vicky K., Abkowitz, Janis L., Appelbaum, Frederick R., Estey, Elihu H.·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Both presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) and achievement of complete remission (CR) with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) rather than CR after induction therapy predict relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These results suggest a correlation between response (peripheral count recovery) and MRD at the time of morphologic remission. Here we examine this hypothesis and whether MRD and response provide independent prognostic information after accounting for other relevant covariates. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 245 adults with AML who achieved CR, CRp, or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) after induction therapy. Bone marrow samples were collected on or closest to the first date of blood count recovery, and MRD was determined by 10-color multiparameter flow cytometry. Results: The 71.0% of patients who achieved CR had MRD less frequently and had lower levels of MRD than the 19.6% of patients achieving CRp and 9.4% achieving CRi. Although pretreatment covariates such as cytogenetics, monosomal karyotype, relapsed or refractory rather than newly diagnosed AML, and FLT3 internal tandem duplication were associated with relapse, their prognostic effect was much lower once MRD and response were taken into account, the univariable statistical effect of which was not materially affected by inclusion of pretreatment covariates. Conclusion: Our data indicate that post-therapy parameters including MRD status and response are important independent prognostic factors for outcome in patients with AML achieving remission. MRD status and type of response (CR v CRp or CRi) should play important, and perhaps dominant, roles in planning postinduction therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.58.3518

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Xie, H., Wood, B. L., Walter, R. B., Pagel, J. M., Becker, P. S., Sandhu, V. K., Abkowitz, J. L., Appelbaum, F. R., & Estey, E. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1258-1264
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2161938647
Cited by
257
References
33
FWCI
25.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation of Clinical Response and Minimal Residual Disease and Their Prognostic Impact on Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.58.3518
The paper
Chen, X., Xie, H., Wood, B. L., Walter, R. B., Pagel, J. M., Becker, P. S., Sandhu, V. K., Abkowitz, J. L., Appelbaum, F. R., & Estey, E. H. (2015). Relation of Clinical Response and Minimal Residual Disease and Their Prognostic Impact on Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.58.3518

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.