Cited by 2,210Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group

Open access
Palumbo, Antonio, Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Oliva, Stefania, Lokhorst, Henk M., Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Rosinol, Laura, Richardson, Paul, Caltagirone, Simona +23 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) is heterogeneous. A simple and reliable tool is needed to stratify patients with MM. We combined the International Staging System (ISS) with chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization after CD138 plasma cell purification and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to evaluate their prognostic value in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Patients and Methods: Clinical and laboratory data from 4,445 patients with NDMM enrolled onto 11 international trials were pooled together. The K-adaptive partitioning algorithm was used to define the most appropriate subgroups with homogeneous survival. Results: ISS, CA, and LDH data were simultaneously available in 3,060 of 4,445 patients. We defined the following three groups: revised ISS (R-ISS) I (n = 871), including ISS stage I (serum β 2 -microglobulin level < 3.5 mg/L and serum albumin level ≥ 3.5 g/dL), no high-risk CA [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)], and normal LDH level (less than the upper limit of normal range); R-ISS III (n = 295), including ISS stage III (serum β 2 -microglobulin level > 5.5 mg/L) and high-risk CA or high LDH level; and R-ISS II (n = 1,894), including all the other possible combinations. At a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year OS rate was 82% in the R-ISS I, 62% in the R-ISS II, and 40% in the R-ISS III groups; the 5-year PFS rates were 55%, 36%, and 24%, respectively. Conclusion: The R-ISS is a simple and powerful prognostic staging system, and we recommend its use in future clinical studies to stratify patients with NDMM effectively with respect to the relative risk to their survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.61.2267

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Revised International Staging System combines tumor burden and disease biology into a unified prognostic index.

    “The Revised International Staging System (RISS) combines elements of tumor burden (ISS) and disease biology (presence of high risk cytogenetic abnormalities or elevated lactate dehydrogenase level) to create a unified prognostic index that and helps in clinical care as well as in comparison of clinical trial data (Table 4).55”
  • The RISS combines elements of tumor burden (ISS) and disease biology.

    “The revised international staging system (RISS) combines elements of tumor burden (ISS) and disease biology [23].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Patients with advanced disease stage (R-ISS stage III) have consistently shown poorer outcomes irrespective of the therapy received.

    “Similarly, patients with advanced disease stage (R-ISS stage III) have consistently shown poorer outcomes irrespective of the therapy received4–6,19–22.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palumbo, A., Avet-Loiseau, H., Oliva, S., Lokhorst, H. M., Goldschmidt, H., Rosinol, L., Richardson, P., Caltagirone, S., Lahuerta, J. J., Facon, T., Bringhen, S., Gay, F., Attal, M., Passera, R., Spencer, A., Offidani, M., Kumar, S., Musto, P., Lonial, S., Petrucci, M. T., Orlowski, R. Z., Zamagni, E., Morgan, G., Dimopoulos, M. A., Durie, B. G. M., Anderson, K. C., Sonneveld, P., San Miguel, J., Cavo, M., Rajkumar, S. V., & Moreau, P.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Antonio Palumbo, Stefania Oliva, Simona Caltagirone, Sara Bringhen, and Francesca Gay, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; Roberto Passera, University of Torino, Torino; Massimo Offidani, Clinica di Ematologia, AUO Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona; Pellegrino Musto, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture; Maria T. Petrucci, Sapienza University of Rome,...
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-09-10
Volume
33
Issue
26
Pages
2863-2869
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2128192762
Cited by
2,210
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 249 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 242 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 248 · 2019: 183 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 11
FWCI
96.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Sanofi
  • Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
  • Celgene
  • Karyopharm Therapeutics
  • Array BioPharma
  • Genentech
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA180888, P50CA142509, U10CA032102, P50CA186781)
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
multiple myeloma, Revised International Staging System, prognostic staging, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, chromosomal abnormalities, 17p deletion, lactate dehydrogenase, beta2-microglobulin, serum albumin, overall survival, progression-free survival, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm Staging, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review