Cited by 778Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Autologous Transplantation and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Open access
Palumbo, Antonio, Cavallo, Federica, Gay, Francesca, Di Raimondo, Francesco, Ben Yehuda, Dina, Petrucci, Maria Teresa, Pezzatti, Sara, Caravita, Tommaso +19 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This open-label, randomized, phase 3 study compared melphalan at a dose of 200 mg per square meter of body-surface area plus autologous stem-cell transplantation with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide (MPR) and compared lenalidomide maintenance therapy with no maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 273 patients 65 years of age or younger to high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation or MPR consolidation therapy after induction, and 251 patients to lenalidomide maintenance therapy or no maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 51.2 months. Both progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation than with MPR (median progression-free survival, 43.0 months vs. 22.4 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.61; P<0.001; and 4-year overall survival, 81.6% vs. 65.3%; hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93; P=0.02). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (41.9 months vs. 21.6 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.65; P<0.001), but 3-year overall survival was not significantly prolonged (88.0% vs. 79.2%; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.15; P=0.14). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent with high-dose melphalan than with MPR (94.3% vs. 51.5%), as were gastrointestinal adverse events (18.4% vs. 0%) and infections (16.3% vs. 0.8%); neutropenia and dermatologic toxic effects were more frequent with lenalidomide maintenance than with no maintenance (23.3% vs. 0% and 4.3% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation therapy with high-dose melphalan plus stem-cell transplantation, as compared with MPR, significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival among patients with multiple myeloma who were 65 years of age or younger. Lenalidomide maintenance, as compared with no maintenance, significantly prolonged progression-free survival. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00551928.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1402888

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lenalidomide is the standard of care for maintenance therapy for most patients with multiple myeloma.

    “Lenalidomide is the standard of care for maintenance therapy for most patients.142–147”

    From Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management (2024) · cites this paper as [144]

    The Discussion reports that lenalidomide maintenance prolonged progression-free survival compared with no maintenance in the trial’s newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients, with benefit in most studied subgroups. It does not establish lenalidomide as the standard of care for most patients with multiple myeloma; it also notes adverse effects and no significant overall-survival improvement in this trial. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]3. Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple my- eloma. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1046-60.
  2. [13]13. Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexa- methasone combination therapy in pa- tients with newly diagnosed multiple my- eloma. Blood 2010; 116: 679-86.
  3. [19]19. Erra- tum, N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 285.]
  4. [23]23. Larocca A, Cavallo F, Bringhen S, et al. Aspirin or enoxaparin thrombopro- phylaxis for patients with newly diag- nosed multiple myeloma treated with le- nalidomide. Blood 2012; 119: 933-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palumbo, A., Cavallo, F., Gay, F., Di Raimondo, F., Ben Yehuda, D., Petrucci, M. T., Pezzatti, S., Caravita, T., Cerrato, C., Ribakovsky, E., Genuardi, M., Cafro, A., Marcatti, M., Catalano, L., Offidani, M., Carella, A. M., Zamagni, E., Patriarca, F., Musto, P., Evangelista, A., Ciccone, G., Omedé, P., Crippa, C., Corradini, P., Nagler, A., Boccadoro, M., & Cavo, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-09-04
Volume
371
Issue
10
Pages
895-905
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143425592
Cited by
778
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
59.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation, high-dose melphalan, progression-free survival, overall survival, neutropenia, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, consolidation therapy, adverse events, immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, lenalidomide
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Melphalan, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Neutropenia, Prednisone, Thalidomide, Transplantation, Autologous, Disease-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, Stem Cell Transplantation, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Maintenance Chemotherapy, Consolidation Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review