Cited by 2,593Cancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access

Basch, Ethan, Deal, Allison M., Kris, Mark G., Scher, Howard I., Hudis, Clifford A., Sabbatini, Paul, Rogak, Lauren, Bennett, Antonia V., Dueck, Amylou C., Atkinson, Thomas M., Chou, Joanne F., Dulko, Dorothy, Sit, Laura, Barz, Allison, Novotny, Paul, Fruscione, Michael, Sloan, Jeff A., Schrag, Deborah·2016·Journal of Clinical Oncology

DOI 10.1200/jco.2015.63.0830PMC PMC4872028

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: There is growing interest to enhance symptom monitoring during routine cancer care using patient-reported outcomes, but evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is limited. Methods: We randomly assigned patients receiving routine outpatient chemotherapy for advanced solid tumors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to report 12 common symptoms via tablet computers or to receive usual care consisting of symptom monitoring at the discretion of clinicians. Those with home computers received weekly e-mail prompts to report between visits. Treating physicians received symptom printouts at visits, and nurses received e-mail alerts when participants reported severe or worsening symptoms. The primary outcome was change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 6 months compared with baseline, measured by the EuroQol EQ-5D Index. Secondary endpoints included emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and survival. Results: Among 766 patients allocated, HRQL improved among more participants in the intervention group than usual care (34% v 18%) and worsened among fewer (38% v 53%; P < .001). Overall, mean HRQL declined by less in the intervention group than usual care (1.4- v 7.1-point drop; P < .001). Patients receiving intervention were less frequently admitted to the ER (34% v 41%; P = .02) or hospitalized (45% v 49%; P = .08) and remained on chemotherapy longer (mean, 8.2 v 6.3 months; P = .002). Although 75% of the intervention group was alive at 1 year, 69% with usual care survived the year (P = .05), with differences also seen in quality-adjusted survival (mean of 8.7 v. 8.0 months; P = .004). Benefits were greater for participants lacking prior computer experience. Most patients receiving intervention (63%) reported severe symptoms during the study. Nurses frequently initiated clinical actions in response to e-mail alerts. Conclusion: Clinical benefits were associated with symptom self-reporting during cancer care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.63.0830

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk
Gray, R. J. (1988) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951 · Cited by 4,957
Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.078 · Cited by 1,382
Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessments and Patient-Physician Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D. V., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027 · Cited by 1,011
What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Kotronoulas, G., Kearney, N., Maguire, R., Harrow, A., Domenico, D. D., Croy, S., & MacGillivray, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.53.5948 · Cited by 953
Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer
Pickard, A. S., Neary, M. P., & Cella, D. F. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-70 · Cited by 932
Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations
Snyder, C., Aaronson, N., Choucair, A., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B., & Santana, M. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x · Cited by 808
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
Chen, J., Ou, L., & Hollis, S. J. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-211 · Cited by 796
The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
Valderas, J. M., Kotzeva, A., Espallargues, M., Guyatt, G., Ferrans, C. E., Halyard, M. Y., Revicki, D. A., Symonds, T., Parada, A., & Alonso, J. (2008) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0 · Cited by 775
Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
Basch, E., Jia, X., Heller, G., Leahy, A. B., Sit, L., Fruscione, M., Appawu, M., Iasonos, A. E., Atkinson, T. M., Goldfarb, S. B., et al. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp386 · Cited by 622
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,001

Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Vital Sign for Dermatologic Clinical Care and Clinical Investigations
Secrest, A. M., & Chren, M. (2022) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.008 · Cited by 21
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review
Gosain, R., Gupta, M., Roy, A. M., Strosberg, J., Glaser, K. M., & Iyer, R. V. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14061428 · Cited by 20
“Decisions informed by HRQoL can help to improve the patients’ physical and mental health and decrease the burden on health care by minimizing frequent hospital admissions and health care utilization [84].”
Background
Using patient-reported data from a smartphone app to capture and characterize real-time patient-reported flares in rheumatoid arthritis
Gandrup, J., Selby, D., van der Veer, S. N., McBeth, J., & Dixon, W. G. (2022) · Rheumatology Advances in Practice · doi:10.1093/rap/rkac021 · Cited by 19
Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) deterioration in glioma patients during the progression-free survival period
Coomans, M. B., Dirven, L., Aaronson, N. K., Baumert, B. G., van den Bent, M. J., Bottomley, A., Brandes, A. A., Chinot, O. L., Coens, C., Gorlia, T., et al. (2022) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac097 · Cited by 19
“33,34 When preventing or treating symptoms, this may subsequently have a positive impact on the patients’ activities in daily life and overall quality of life.”
Background
Persistent symptoms of fatigue, neuropathy and role‐functioning impairment among indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: A longitudinal PROFILES registry study
Ekels, A., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., Posthuma, E. F. M., Kieffer, J. M., Issa, D. E., Koster, A., Nijziel, M. R., Pruijt, J. H. F. M., Stevens, W. B. C., Tick, L. W., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.18139 · Cited by 19
Acupuncture for adult lung cancer of patient-reported outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Xi, Z., Wei, X., Ye, Z., Wang, K., & Zhou, J. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.921151 · Cited by 19
A multisite randomized controlled trial of an early palliative care intervention in children with advanced cancer: The PediQUEST Response Study Protocol
Dussel, V., Orellana, L., Holder, R. L., Porth, R., Avery, M. E., & Wolfe, J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277212 · Cited by 20
Prevalence, severity, and predictors of symptom burden among adolescents and young adults with cancer
Gupta, S., Li, Q., Nathan, P. C., D’Agostino, N. M., Baxter, N. N., Fox, C. J., Chalifour, K., Coburn, N. G., & Sutradhar, R. (2023) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5837 · Cited by 19
Using a chatbot to reduce emergency department visits and unscheduled hospitalizations among patients with gynecologic malignancies during chemotherapy: A retrospective cohort study
Huang, M.-Y., Weng, C.-S., Kuo, H.-L., & Su, Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15798 · Cited by 19
Digital health interventions in dermatology—Mapping technology and study parameters of systematically identified publications
Reinders, P., Augustin, M., Kirsten, N., Fleyder, A., & Otten, M. (2023) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.19392 · Cited by 19
“9 We identified several DHIs that are promising in achieving these goals, such an active data documentation by clients to support disease monitoring, 7 client-centred messaging to support treatment adherence 8 or applications that promote the prevention of skin cancer.”
Background
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With CKD: The Case for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Tools
Tang, E., Yantsis, A., Ho, M., Hussain, J., Dano, S., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Peipert, J. D., & Mucsi, I. (2023) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.007 · Cited by 21
A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi process
Jacob, C., Lindeque, J. P., Müller, R., Klein, A., Metcalfe, T., Connolly, S. L., Koerber, F., Maguire, R., Denis, F., Heuss, S., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00982-w · Cited by 17
“…4) whether the tool allows for data sharing and segregation for research use, 5) data ﬁ ndability and retrievability including metadata de ﬁ nition, 6) whether the tool is usable and accessible in the intended clinical setting, 7) affordability of the tool taking into account the local…”
Pleasurable and problematic receptive anal intercourse and diseases of the colon, rectum and anus
Dickstein, D. R., Edwards, C. R., Rowan, C. R., Avanessian, B. K., Chubak, B. M., Wheldon, C. W., Simoes, P. K., Buckstein, M. H., Keefer, L., Safer, J. D., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-024-00932-1 · Cited by 19
Implementing a Method for Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes Associated With Oral Oncolytic Therapy
Mackler, E. R., Petersen, L., Severson, J. A., Blayney, D. W., Benitez, L. L., Rausch, C. R., Hough, S. M., & Griggs, J. J. (2017) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2016.018390 · Cited by 19
Health-related quality of life in patients with major salivary gland carcinoma
Becker, C., Pfeiffer, J., Lange, K., & Dahlem, K. (2018) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-018-4914-7 · Cited by 19
“This potentially reduces disease-related complications and enhance patients’ experience and satisfaction [30, 31].”
Background
Hispanic breast cancer patients’ symptom experience and patient-physician communication during chemotherapy
Krok‐Schoen, J. L., Fernandez, K., Unzeitig, G. W., Rubio, G., Paskett, E. D., & Post, D. M. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4375-y · Cited by 19
Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Cosmetic Surgery Clinics: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
Kaur, M. N., Pusic, A. L., Sidey-Gibbons, C. J., & Klassen, A. F. (2018) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1093/asj/sjy280 · Cited by 19
“collecting PROM data, (2) peer-benchmarking, (3) return on investment, and (4) concerns unique to private practice cosmetic clinics.”
Background
Cost-effectiveness of a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) relative to aprepitant plus granisetron (APR + GRAN) for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a trial-based analysis
Botteman, M. F., Nickel, K., Corman, S. L., Turini, M., & Binder, G. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04824-y · Cited by 19
Developing and validating utility parameters to establish patient-reported outcome-based perioperative symptom management in patients with lung cancer: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study protocol
Dai, W., Xie, S., Zhang, R., Wei, X., Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., Liao, X., Mu, Y., Zhou, H., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030726 · Cited by 19
Promoting effective use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: themes from a “Methods Tool kit” paper series
Brundage, M., Wu, A. W., Rivera, Y. M., & Snyder, C. F. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.022 · Cited by 19
Mending Disconnects in Cancer Care: Setting an Agenda for Research, Practice, and Policy
Alfano, C. M., Mayer, D. K., Beckjord, E. B., Ahern, D. K., Galioto, M., Sheldon, L. K., Klesges, L. M., Aronoff-Spencer, E. S., & Hesse, B. W. (2020) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.20.00046 · Cited by 19
Symptom Burden of Nonresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Mavros, M. N., Davis, L., Hallet, J. I., Tung, S., Mahar, A. L., Bubis, L. D., Hammad, A., Zhao, H., Earle, C. C., Barbera, L. C., et al. (2020) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000001629 · Cited by 19
Inferences About Drug Safety in Phase III Trials in Oncology: Examples From Advanced Prostate Cancer
Drago, J. Z., Gönen, M., Thanarajasingam, G., Sacks, C. A., Morris, M. J., Kantoff, P. W., & Stopsack, K. H. (2020) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa134 · Cited by 19
“Patient characteristics Age, median (range), y 74 (52-97) 73 (53-92) 75 (50-92) 70 (42-92) 68 (43-90) 71 (42-93) 69 (41-89) Excellent performance status, ECOG-PS 0, % 77.”
Improving patient-reported measures in oncology: a payer call to action
Schmidt, T. A., Valuck, T., Perkins, B., Riposo, J. W., Patel, P., Westrich, K. D., Basch, E., & McClellan, M. (2020) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2020.20313 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Assessment of Multiple Co-Occurring Cancer Symptoms in the Clinical Setting
Cooley, M. E., & Siefert, M. L. (2016) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2016.08.003 · Cited by 19
Interprofessional, psycho‐social intervention to facilitate resilience and reduce supportive care needs for patients with cancer: Results of a noncomparative, randomized phase II trial
Eicher, M., Ribi, K., Senn-Dubey, C., Senn, S., Ballabeni, P., & Betticher, D. C. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4734 · Cited by 19
“There is growing evidence supporting the utility of electronic measurements for improving patient reported outcomes in cancer care.(31) While implementation (ie, time) can be challenging, our initial results from this “real‐world” study highlight opportunities for interprofessional application of potential digital sol…”
Background
Effectiveness of symptom monitoring on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) among patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xia, Y., Guan, X., Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Shi, Z., & He, P. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01812-x · Cited by 19
“Therandomizationwasprimarily performedbycomputers, twostudies allocated participantsthroughpermutedblocksviacomputer 39,40 ,twostudies used computer-generated sequential numbers 30,31,46 , Billingy et al. 28,29 involved sequential transition of the participating hospitals in a randomized order,…”
Influential
Incorporating Multiple Perspectives Into the Development of an Electronic Survivorship Platform for Head and Neck Cancer
Salz, T., Schnall, R., McCabe, M. S., Oeffinger, K. C., Corcoran, S., Vickers, A. J., Salner, A., Dornelas, E. A., Raghunathan, N. J., Fortier, E., et al. (2018) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.17.00105 · Cited by 18
Longitudinal changes in the quality of life of oral cancer patients during the perioperative period
Aoki, T., Ota, Y., Suzuki, T., Denda, Y., Aoyama, K.-I., Akiba, T., Naito, M., & Arai, T. (2018) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-018-1322-3 · Cited by 18
Feasibility of Tablet-Based Patient-Reported Symptom Data Collection Among Hemodialysis Patients
Flythe, J. E., Tugman, M. J., Narendra, J. H., Dorough, A., Hilbert, J., Assimon, M. M., & DeWalt, D. A. (2020) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.021 · Cited by 18
A Mobile Health Platform for Self-Management of Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative Study of Adaptation to Stakeholder Needs and Integration in Clinical Settings
Rutland, S. B., Bergquist, R. P., Hager, A., Geurs, R., Mims, C., Gutierrez, H. H., & Oates, G. R. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/19413 · Cited by 18
“Studies have reported associations between the use of patient-generated health data and improved symptom control and quality of life [10-14], patient-clinician communication and satisfaction [15,16], reduced health care utilization, and increased survival [17-20].”
Background
Caregiver–Oncologist Prognostic Concordance, Caregiver Mastery, and Caregiver Psychological Health and Quality of Life
Loh, K. P., Mohamed, M., Kadambi, S. G., Culakova, E., Xu, H., Magnuson, A. M., Flannery, M. A., Duberstein, P. R., Epstein, R. M., McHugh, C. M., et al. (2021) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1002/onco.13699 · Cited by 18
Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a predictive nomogram including BMI, sex and age
Formica, V., Nardecchia, A., Morelli, C., Lucchetti, J., Giuliano, G., Renzi, N., Gallo, C., Pellegrino, R., Massimiliani, V., Serci, C., et al. (2021) · Annals of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.21037/apm-20-2194 · Cited by 18
“Moreover, HRQoL maintenance is a fundamental requirement for innovative therapies since toxicityrelated HRQoL impairment may significantly limit their implementation, and therefore it is often set as secondary endpoint in clinical trials (9-11).”
Background
Young, Empowered and Strong: A Web-Based Education and Supportive Care Intervention for Young Women With Breast Cancer Across the Care Continuum
Sella, T., Snow, C., Freeman, H., Poorvu, P. D., Rosenberg, S. M., & Partridge, A. H. (2021) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.21.00067 · Cited by 18
Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals’ preferences for learning content and methods
Sztankay, M. J., Wintner, L. M., Roggendorf, S., Nordhausen, T., Dirven, L., TAPHOORN, M. J. B., Leeuw, I. M. V., Velikova, G., Bottomley, A., Kuliś, D., et al. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06676-x · Cited by 18
The Use of Telemedicine in Cancer Clinical Trials: Connect-Patient-to-Doctor Prospective Study
Meghiref, Y., Parnot, C., Duverger, C., Difoum, F. L., Gourden, A., Yssaad, H., Leiterer, C., Bedekovic, C., Blanchard, J., Ammar, H. N., et al. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/31255 · Cited by 18
“Bash et al [16] evaluated the impact of symptom monitoring in the management of 766 cancer patients and found a significant improvement in the patients’quality of life from the monitoring (34% versus 18%, P<.”
Patient reported outcomes in the daily practice in clinical oncology: A systematic review
Lutz, A. T., Griza, A., Machado, G. M., Loose, U., Dahmer, A., & Herbert, J. S. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103658 · Cited by 21
How technology can improve communication and health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review
Ansari, N., Wilson, C. M., Heneghan, M. B., Supiano, K. P., & Mooney, K. H. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07037-y · Cited by 18
Co-created Mobile Apps for Palliative Care Using Community-Partnered Participatory Research: Development and Usability Study
Al‐Mondhiry, J., D’Ambruoso, S. F., Pietras, C. J., Strouse, T. B., Benzeevi, D., Arevian, A. C., & Wells, K. B. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/33849 · Cited by 18
“Specifically, the use of web-based platforms to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and overall survival [8], mediated by proactive management of emergent symptoms.”
Background
Impact of connected health interventions on psychological wellbeing and quality of life in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Gitonga, I., Desmond, D. M., Duda, N., & Maguire, R. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6019 · Cited by 17
Symptoms and Needs Monitoring in Diverse Ambulatory Oncology Patients: Usage Characteristics and Impact on Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalization
Natori, A., Sookdeo, V. D., Koru‐Sengul, T., Schlumbrecht, M. P., Calfa, C. L., Maclntyre, J., Benzo, R. M., Moreno, P. I., Crane, T. E., Garcia, S. F., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01038 · Cited by 18
“2%); however, these are limited to clinical trials.(10,15) Consequently, several centers have implemented routine EHR-based PRO monitoring with ongoing efforts, including engagement from stakeholders and integration of available information technologies to expand patient outreach to any ambulatory patient across the c…”
Background
Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with non-small cell Lung Cancer: a scoping review
Liao, K. F., Wang, T., Coomber-Moore, J., Wong, D., Gomes, F., Finn, C. F., Sperrin, M., Yorke, J., & van der Veer, S. N. (2022) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10151-z · Cited by 20
“Randomised controlled trials comparing PROM-directed follow-up to usual care demonstrated that integrating PROMs in care pathways was associated with better symptom control, reduced emergency department attendance and hospitalisation, and improved survival [8, 9].”
Unpleasant symptoms of immunotherapy for people with lung cancer: A mixed-method study
Zhang, J., Wang, S., Zhou, Z., Cheng, L., Yu, H., Zeng, C., Xia, X., Qiao, G., & Shi, Q. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104430 · Cited by 19
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators in Using Patient-Reported Outcome Systems for Cancer Care: Systematic Mapping Study
Laitio, A.-M., Giunti, G., & Halonen, R. (2023) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/40875 · Cited by 18
“Routine patient-reported outcome (PRO) follow-up of patients with cancer improves long-term treatment outcomes [2,3].”
Background
Telehealth Preferences Among Patients With Advanced Cancer in the Post COVID-19 Vaccine Era
Shih, K. K., Arechiga, A. B., Chen, X., Urbauer, D. L., de Moraes, A. R., Rodriguez, A. J., Thomas, L., Stanton, P. A., Bruera, E. D., & Hui, D. S. C. (2024) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.572 · Cited by 17
Electronic health intervention to manage symptoms of immunotherapy in patients with cancer (SOFIA): Results from a randomized controlled pilot trial
Sauer, C., Zschäbitz, S., Krauß, J., Walle, T., Haag, G. M., Jäger, D., Hiller, K., Bugaj, T. J., Friederich, H., & Maatouk, I. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35300 · Cited by 20
“However, on closer inspection, the findings indicate some ten-dencies, such as fewer patients in the IG showing therapy ‐ related emergency visits, a conclusion consistent with the result of Basch et al. 11 Furthermore, more patients in the IG used psycho ‐ oncological support during the follow ‐ up period.”
Result
Machine learning models including patient-reported outcome data in oncology: a systematic literature review and analysis of their reporting quality
Krepper, D., Cesari, M., Hubel, N. J., Zelger, P., & Sztankay, M. J. (2024) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-024-00808-7 · Cited by 22
“Potential clinical benefits of PROs range from enhanced symptom management and patient-clinician communication to improved overall survival [4, 5].”
Background
Zukunft jetzt − Implementierung eines IT-gestützten Distress-Screenings
Koehler, M., Hornemann, B., Holzner, B., Schäffeler, N., Zimmermann, T., Nest, A., Wifling, K., & Herschbach, P. (2017) · Der Onkologe · doi:10.1007/s00761-017-0209-7 · Cited by 19
Assessing Psychological Toxicity and Patient-Reported Distress as the Sixth Vital Sign in Cancer Care and Clinical Trials
LeBlanc, T. W., & Kamal, A. H. (2017) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.stas1-1705 · Cited by 18
Impact of Adverse Event Solicitation on the Safety Profile of SQ House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet
Nolte, H., Bernstein, D. I., Sussman, G. L., Fogh, B. S., Lu, S., Husøy, B., & Nelson, H. S. (2018) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.037 · Cited by 18
Patient-reported Outcomes, Functional Assessment, and Utility Values in Glaucoma
Skalicky, S. E., Lamoureux, E. L., Crabb, D. P., & Ramulu, P. Y. (2018) · Journal of Glaucoma · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000001155 · Cited by 18
Design of the functional requirements of a smartphone app for patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents: The e-OncoSalud® app
Collado‐Borrell, R., Escudero‐Vilaplana, V., Ribed, A., Anglada-Martínez, H., Martín-Conde, M., Alonso, A. H., Codina-Jané, C., & Sanjurjo‐Sáez, M. (2019) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155219840419 · Cited by 18
“Nowadays, around 40% of deaths in the USA are caused by changes in habits and lifestyle, such as lack of adherence, thus making reduced empowerment one of the factors contributing to preventable mortality.(1,5) The mhealth may support healthcare professionals in the patients monitoring.”
Background
Bridging the gap in outpatient care: Can a daily patient‐reported outcome measure help?
Meryk, A., Kropshofer, G., Hetzer, B., Riedl, D., Lehmann, J., Rumpold, G., Haid, A., Holzner, B., & Crazzolara, R. (2021) · Cancer Reports · doi:10.1002/cnr2.1421 · Cited by 17
Impact of a Dedicated Cancer Urgent Care Center on Acute Care Utilization
Rothberg, B. E. G., Canavan, M. E., Mun, S., Sedghi, T., Carafeno, T., Raucci, M., Dest, V., Sinanis, N., Gross, C. P., & Adelson, K. B. (2021) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.21.00183 · Cited by 19
“Presently, the most common gateway to cancer-related acute care delivery is the emergency department (ED),(6,7) a phenomenon precipitated by both the lack of same-day sick visit capacity in typical oncology practices and patients’ reluctance to communicate acute symptoms to their oncologist until they require immediat…”
Background
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: A narrative review of a standardized symptom assessment tool in head and neck oncology
Noel, C. W., Forner, D. W. A., Chepeha, D. B., Baran, E., Chan, K., Parmar, A., Husain, Z. A., Karam, I., Hallet, J. I., Coburn, N. G., et al. (2021) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105595 · Cited by 18
Association between patient‐initiated emails and overall 2‐year survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: Evidence from the real‐world setting
Coquet, J., Blayney, D. W., Brooks, J. D., & Hernandez‐Boussard, T. (2020) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.3483 · Cited by 18
Usability and User Experience of an mHealth App for Therapy Support of Patients With Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study Using Eye Tracking
Anders, C., Moorthy, P., Svensson, L., Müller, J., Heinze, O., Knaup, P., Wallwiener, M., Deutsch, T. M., Le, T.-V., & Weinert, L. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/50926 · Cited by 17
“This more relevant treatment information, in turn, helps improve therapy monitoring, treatment quality, and patient satisfaction [8,9].”
Background
Remote Patient Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology in Cancer Care and Research: Patients' Views and Preferences
Stuijt, D. G., van Doeveren, E. E. M., Kos, M., Eversdijk, M., Bosch, J. J., Bins, A. D., Bak, M., & van Oijen, M. G. H. (2024) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.24.00092 · Cited by 21
Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals
Amat-Fernández, C., Pardo, Y., Ferrer, M., Bosch, G., Lizano-Barrantes, C., Briseño, R., Vernet-Tomás, M. D. M., Fumadó, L., Beisani, M., Redondo‐Pachón, D., et al. (2025) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-025-02333-7 · Cited by 18
The iPROMOS protocol: a stepped-wedge study to implement routine patient-reported outcomes in a medical oncology outpatient setting
Roberts, N. A., Mudge, A., Alexander, K. E., Wyld, D., & Janda, M. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027046 · Cited by 17
“In the co-design process, using the broader research evidence, investigated to support clinician’s recommendations, a reported symptom of grade 2 or higher for nausea, vomiting or anorexia, and grade 3 for all other symptoms is considered significant.(5) If there is an increase in symptoms greater than 2 points from t…”
Electronic symptom monitoring in patients with metastatic lung cancer: a feasibility study
Friis, R. B., Hjøllund, N. H., Mejdahl, C. T., Pappot, H., & Skúladóttir, H. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035673 · Cited by 18
Standardizing Health Outcomes for Lung Cancer. Adaptation of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Set to the Spanish Setting
Escudero‐Vilaplana, V., Calles, A., Collado‐Borrell, R., Marzal-Alfaro, M. B., Polanco, C., Garrido, C., Suarez, J., Ortiz, A., Appierto, M., Comellas, M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01645 · Cited by 16
“Of note, systematic weekly collection of LC associated symptoms has been related to higher survival (10–13), better HRQoL and a better allocation of health resources (12).”
Background
Effect of cyclooxygenase inhibitor use on immunotherapy efficacy in non‐small cell lung cancer
Kanai, O., Ito, T., Saito, Z., Yamamoto, Y., Fujita, K., Okamura, M., Hashimoto, M., Nakatani, K., Sawai, S., & Mio, T. (2021) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.13845 · Cited by 17
Impact of assessment frequency of patient-reported outcomes: an observational study using an eHealth platform in cancer patients
Innominato, P. F., Komarzynski, S., Dallmann, R., Wreglesworth, N. I., Bouchahda, M., Karaboué, A., Ulusakarya, A., Subbe, C. P., Spiegel, D., & Lévi, F. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06262-1 · Cited by 20
“Most frequently, however, weekly electronic PRO remote monitoring has been adopted in oncological studies and practice [1, 3, 11].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Cardiomyopathy
Garcia, R. A., Benton, M. C., & Spertus, J. A. (2021) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-021-01511-5 · Cited by 17
Evaluating the Effects of Symptom Monitoring on Menopausal Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Andrews, R., Hale, G. E., John, B., & Lancastle, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Global Women s Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2021.757706 · Cited by 19
Results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial exploring the use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure in the management of UK patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
Kyte, D. G., Anderson, N. E., Bishop, J. R. B., Bissell, A., Brettell, E. A., Calvert, M., Chadburn, M., Cockwell, P., Dutton, M., Eddington, H., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050610 · Cited by 17
Updates in Cancer Rehabilitation Telehealth
Chang, P. J., & Zheng, J. Y. (2022) · Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports · doi:10.1007/s40141-022-00372-5 · Cited by 17
“Interestingly, two studies demonstrated a survival benefit with telehealth symptom monitoring [43, 44].”
Background
Early palliative care for solid and blood cancer patients and caregivers: Quantitative and qualitative results of a long-term experience as a case of value-based medicine
Bigi, S., Borelli, E., Potenza, L., Gilioli, F., Artioli, F., Porzio, G., Luppi, M., & Bandieri, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1092145 · Cited by 17
The Effectiveness of Telenursing Interventions on Patient Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Kim, Y. M., Min, A., & Hong, H. C. (2023) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151406 · Cited by 16
Norwegian general population normative data for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires: the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, the Sexual Health Questionnaire QLQ-SHQ22 and the sexual domains of the QLQ-BR23/BR45
Åsberg, R. E., Nilsen, M., Hjermstad, M. J., Reinertsen, K. V., Karlsen, J., Giskeødegård, G. F., & Reidunsdatter, R. J. (2023) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112943 · Cited by 17
Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study
Lehmann, J., de Ligt, K. M., Tipelius, S., Giesinger, J. M., Sztankay, M. J., Voigt, S., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., Rumpold, G., Weger, R., Willenbacher, E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/46017 · Cited by 18
“…complements evidence from large-scale clinical trials with diverse populations that provide evidence of the benefits of PRO monitoring systems [8,14,29,32], with important nuanced information on how such a monitoring system can function in routine clinical practice for patients with multiple…”
Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Lopes, A. M. D. S., Colomer‐Lahiguera, S., Darnac, C., Giacomini, S., Bugeia, S., Gutknecht, G., Spurrier‐Bernard, G., Aedo-Lopez, V., Mederos, N., Latifyan, S., et al. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07934-w · Cited by 17
“Contrasting with other trials using PRO-CTCAETM items [44, 45], it accommodates the use of the full item library, lending itself to the heterogeneous toxicity of ICI.”
Method
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: From an Endpoint to an Intervention in Cancer Care
Narra, L. R., Verdini, N. P., Lapen, K., Nipp, R. D., & Gillespie, E. F. (2023) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.07.002 · Cited by 19
Patient Portals to Elicit Essential Patient-Reported Elements of Communication Supporting Person-Centered Oncologic Care: A Pilot Study of the PERSON Approach
Epstein, A. S., Knežević, A., Romano, D. R., Hoque, A., Raj, N. P., Reidy‐Lagunes, D. L., Rosa, W. E., Cruz, E. R., Calderon, C., O'Shaughnessy, S., et al. (2023) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.23.00125 · Cited by 17
Perceived Barriers Toward Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation in Cancer Care: An International Scoping Survey
Eng, L., Chan, R. J., Chan, A., Charalambous, A., Darling, H., Grech, L., van den Hurk, C. J. G., Kirk, D., Mitchell, S. A., Poprawski, D. M., et al. (2024) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.23.00715 · Cited by 18
The Growing Role of Digital Health Tools in the Care of Patients with Cancer: Current Use, Future Opportunities, and Barriers to Effective Implementation
Haemmerle, R. J., Paludo, J., Haddad, T. C., & Pritchett, J. C. (2024) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-024-01534-5 · Cited by 17
“In summary, the role and scope of ePROs in the future landscape of cancer care are likely to expand as the benefits are further studied and promulgated [16, 17, 23, 24 •• , 25, 26].”
The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review
Salmani, H., Nasiri, S., & Ahmadi, M. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241257146 · Cited by 19
“4,5 While paper-based approaches can report complications and outcomes, they face numerous limitations such as physical space constraints, data loss, and limited access for care providers to vital data when and where needed due to the accumulation of vast amounts of nonreal-time data.”
Background
Re-Envisioning Electronic Health Records to Optimize Patient-Centered Cancer Care, Quality, Surveillance, and Research
Singh, A. P., Balogh, E. P., Carlson, R. W., Huizinga, M. M., Malin, B., Melamed, A., Meropol, N. J., Pisano, E. D., Winn, R. A., Yabroff, K. R., et al. (2024) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.24.00260 · Cited by 17
Collecting, Integrating, and Disseminating Patient-Reported Outcomes for Research in a Learning Healthcare System
Harle, C. A., Lipori, G. P., & Hurley, R. W. (2016) · eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) · doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1240 · Cited by 17
Variables associated with patient-reported outcomes in persons with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase-inhibitor therapy
Jiang, Q., Wang, H., Yu, L., & Gale, R. P. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-017-2353-2 · Cited by 17
Rationale, development, and design of the Altering Intake , Managing Symptoms (AIMS) dietary intervention for bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer survivors
Sun, V. C.-Y., Crane, T. E., Slack, S. D., Yung, A., Wright, S. R., Sentovich, S. M., Melstrom, K. A., Fakih, M., Krouse, R. S., & Thomson, C. A. (2018) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.03.010 · Cited by 17
Development of an eHealth System to Capture and Analyze Patient Sensor and Self-Report Data: Mixed-Methods Assessment of Potential Applications to Improve Cancer Care Delivery
Lucas, A. R., Bass, M., Rothrock, N. E., O'Connor, M. L., Sorkin, M., Nawyn, J., Albinali, F., & Wagner, L. I. (2018) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/medinform.9525 · Cited by 18
“However, integrating such self-report systems into routine clinical care with minimal disruption is of key importance [11], which is where eHealth-based platforms may offer significant potential.”
Background
A pilot evaluation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) tool in Ontario
Brundage, M., Barbera, L. C., McCallum, F., & Howell, D. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-2034-x · Cited by 17
Fixed combination of oral NEPA (netupitant‐palonosetron) for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy: Efficacy data from 2 randomized, double‐blind phase III studies
Schwartzberg, L. S., Karthaus, M., Rossi, G., Rizzi, G., Borroni, M. E., Rugo, H. S., Jordan, K., & Hansen, V. L. (2019) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.2091 · Cited by 16
Prioritizing the Patient Perspective in Oncologic Surgery
Panda, N., & Haynes, A. B. (2019) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07753-6 · Cited by 17
Remote follow-up using patient-reported outcome measures in patients with chronic kidney disease: the PROKID study – study protocol for a non-inferiority pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Grove, B. E., Ivarsen, P., de Thurah, A. L., Schougaard, L. M. V., Kyte, D. G., & Hjøllund, N. H. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4461-y · Cited by 17
Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol
Li, L., Yang, B., Li, H., Yin, J., Jin, F., Han, S., Liao, N., Shi, J., Ling, R., Li, Z., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032945 · Cited by 17
Can post-treatment oral cancer patients’ concerns reflect their cancer characteristics, HRQoL, psychological distress level and satisfaction with consultation?
Aminnudin, A. N., Doss, J. G., Ismail, S. M., Chai, M. B., Abidin, M. Z., Basri, C. S. J. M., Kipli, N. P., & Wei, L. C. (2020) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2020.1118 · Cited by 17
Using Patient-Reported Measures to Improve Outcomes in Kidney Disease
Mclaren, S., Jhamb, M., & Unruh, M. L. (2021) · Blood Purification · doi:10.1159/000515640 · Cited by 17
Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience
Taarnhøj, G. A., Lindberg, H., Johansen, C., & Pappot, H. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10091852 · Cited by 17
“The completion rate is, however, at a level observed in similar studies, even though this is an elderly and often comorbid population [12,47,48].”
BackgroundResult
Current Challenges in Access to Melanoma Care: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Khushalani, N. I., Truong, T., & Thompson, J. F. (2021) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_320301 · Cited by 17
How Should Oncologists Choose an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System for Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cancer?
Denis, F., & Krakowski, I. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30549 · Cited by 16
“This was included in randomized studies of ePRO systems for patients with cancer [1-9].”
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dermatology
Kirby, J. S. (2021) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1559 · Cited by 17
Enhancing Outpatient Symptom Management in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Noel, C. W., Du, Y. J., Baran, E., Forner, D. W. A., Husain, Z. A., Higgins, K. M., Karam, I., Chan, K., Hallet, J. I., Wright, F. C., et al. (2022) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2021.4555 · Cited by 17
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm Predicting Emergency Department Use and Unplanned Hospitalization in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Noel, C. W., Sutradhar, R., Conn, L. G., Forner, D. W. A., Chan, W. C., Fu, R., Hallet, J. I., Coburn, N. G., & Eskander, A. E. (2022) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1629 · Cited by 18
Supportive Oncology Care at Home Intervention for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
Nipp, R. D., Gaufberg, E., Vyas, C., Azoba, C. C., Qian, C. L., Jaggers, J. L., Weekes, C. D., Allen, J. N., Roeland, E. J., Parikh, A. R., et al. (2022) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.22.00088 · Cited by 18
“Previous work demonstrates that symptom monitoring interventions can enhance quality of life (QOL), prevent hospitalizations, and increase survival in oncology settings.(11-13) Additionally, studies have shown encouraging results for hospital-at-home interventions, mainly in general medical populations, as a strategy…”
Background
The Value of Cancer Immunotherapy Summit at the 2016 Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer 31st Anniversary Annual Meeting
Kaufman, H. L., Atkins, M. B., Dicker, A. P., Jim, H., Garrison, L. P., Herbst, R. S., McGivney, W. T., Silverstein, S., Wigginton, J. M., & Yu, P. P. (2017) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0241-6 · Cited by 17
Novel approaches to support breast cancer survivorship care models
Gast, K. C., Allen, S. V., Ruddy, K. J., & Haddad, T. C. (2017) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.08.004 · Cited by 19
Patient Use of Electronic Methods to Self-Report Symptoms: An Integrative Literature Review
Carrasco, S., & Symes, L. (2018) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/18.onf.399-416 · Cited by 17

Authors: Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., Rogak, L., Bennett, A. V., Dueck, A. C., Atkinson, T. M., Chou, J. F., Dulko, D., Sit, L., Barz, A., Novotny, P., Fruscione, M., Sloan, J. A., & Schrag, D.
Affiliations: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Ethan Basch, Mark G. Kris, Howard I. Scher, Clifford A. Hudis, Paul Sabbatini, Lauren Rogak, Thomas M. Atkinson, Joanne F. Chou, Dorothy Dulko, Laura Sit, Michael Fruscione, and Deborah Schrag, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Ethan Basch, Allison M. Deal, and Antonia V. Bennett, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Amylou C. Dueck, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Allison Barz, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Paul Novotny and Jeff A. Sloan, Mayo Clinic,...
ORCID: Basch, Ethan
Deal, Allison M.
Kris, Mark G.
Scher, Howard I.
Hudis, Clifford A.
Sabbatini, Paul
Rogak, Lauren
Bennett, Antonia V.
Dueck, Amylou C.
Atkinson, Thomas M.
Chou, Joanne F.
Dulko, Dorothy
Sit, Laura
Novotny, Paul
Fruscione, Michael
Sloan, Jeff A.
Schrag, Deborah
Venue: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Published: 2016-02-20
Volume: 34
Issue: 6
Pages: 557-565
ISSN: 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
1527-7755
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.0830
PMC: PMC4872028
OpenAlex: W2195040438
Cited by: 2,593
References: 36
Citations by year: 2026: 252 · 2025: 263 · 2024: 321 · 2023: 288 · 2022: 316 · 2021: 299 · 2020: 292 · 2019: 191 · 2018: 180 · 2017: 143 · 2016: 44
FWCI: 53.87
Type: journal article
Language: en
Update notices: correction (2019-02-07)
correction (2016-06-20)
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Society of Memorial Sloan Kettering
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748, P30CA015083, P30CA016086)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords: patient-reported outcomes, symptom monitoring, cancer chemotherapy, health-related quality of life, advanced solid tumors, e-mail alerts, emergency department visits, hospitalization, survival, quality-adjusted survival, computer literacy, outpatient oncology
MeSH terms: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Antineoplastic Agents, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Survival Rate, Internet, Nurse's Role, Electronic Mail, Self Report, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks