The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Radiotherapy reduces the absolute risk of breast cancer mortality by a few percentage points in suitable women but can cause a second cancer or heart disease decades later. We estimated the absolute long-term risks of modern breast cancer radiotherapy. Methods: First, a systematic literature review was performed of lung and heart doses in breast cancer regimens published during 2010 to 2015. Second, individual patient data meta-analyses of 40,781 women randomly assigned to breast cancer radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy in 75 trials yielded rate ratios (RRs) for second primary cancers and cause-specific mortality and excess RRs (ERRs) per Gy for incident lung cancer and cardiac mortality. Smoking status was unavailable. Third, the lung or heart ERRs per Gy in the trials and the 2010 to 2015 doses were combined and applied to current smoker and nonsmoker lung cancer and cardiac mortality rates in population-based data. Results: Average doses from 647 regimens published during 2010 to 2015 were 5.7 Gy for whole lung and 4.4 Gy for whole heart. The median year of irradiation was 2010 (interquartile range [IQR], 2008 to 2011). Meta-analyses yielded lung cancer incidence ≥ 10 years after radiotherapy RR of 2.10 (95% CI, 1.48 to 2.98; P < .001) on the basis of 134 cancers, indicating 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.20) ERR per Gy whole-lung dose. For cardiac mortality, RR was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.46; P < .001) on the basis of 1,253 cardiac deaths. Detailed analyses indicated 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06) ERR per Gy whole-heart dose. Estimated absolute risks from modern radiotherapy were as follows: lung cancer, approximately 4% for long-term continuing smokers and 0.3% for nonsmokers; and cardiac mortality, approximately 1% for smokers and 0.3% for nonsmokers. Conclusion: For long-term smokers, the absolute risks of modern radiotherapy may outweigh the benefits, yet for most nonsmokers (and ex-smokers), the benefits of radiotherapy far outweigh the risks. Hence, smoking can determine the net effect of radiotherapy on mortality, but smoking cessation substantially reduces radiotherapy risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
Darby, S. C., Ewertz, M., McGale, P., Bennet, A. M., Blom-Goldman, U., Brønnum, D., Correa, C., Cutter, D., Gagliardi, G., Gigante, B., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1209825 · Cited by 3,974
Self-citationEarly Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60993-8 · Cited by 3,075
EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group) (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60488-8 · Cited by 2,254
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5 · Cited by 2,089
50-Year Trends in Smoking-Related Mortality in the United States
Thun, M. J., Carter, B. D., Feskanich, D., Freedman, N. D., Prentice, R., Lopez, A. D., Hartge, P., & Gapstur, S. M. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1211127 · Cited by 1,177
Internal Mammary and Medial Supraclavicular Irradiation in Breast Cancer
Poortmans, P. M., Collette, S., Kirkove, C., Van Limbergen, E., Budach, V., Struikmans, H., Collette, L., Fourquet, A., Maingon, P., Valli, M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1415369 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
Curigliano, G., Lenihan, D., Fradley, M., Ganatra, S., Barac, A., Blaes, A., Herrmann, J., Porter, C., Lyon, A. R., Lancellotti, P., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.023 · Cited by 1,031
Tutzauer, J., Sjöström, M., Holmberg, E., Karlsson, P., Killander, F., Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F., Malmström, P., Niméus, E., Fernö, M., & Jögi, A. (2022) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-021-01630-4 · Cited by 53
Advances in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
Upadhyay, R., & Bazan, J. G. (2023) · Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.soc.2023.03.002 · Cited by 39
Hu, Y., Xia, W., & Hou, M. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.3892/ijmm.2018.3838 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, C., Correa, C., Duane, F. K., Aznar, M. C., Anderson, S. J., Bergh, J., Dodwell, D., Ewertz, M., Gray, R., Jagsi, R., Pierce, L., Pritchard, K. I., Swain, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Whelan, T., Peto, R., McGale, P., & for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-05-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1641-1649
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2598117381
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 63.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.72.0722
- The paper
- Taylor, C., Correa, C., Duane, F. K., Aznar, M. C., Anderson, S. J., Bergh, J., Dodwell, D., Ewertz, M., Gray, R., Jagsi, R., Pierce, L., Pritchard, K. I., Swain, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Whelan, T., Peto, R., McGale, P., & for the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. (2017). Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.72.0722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.