Cited by 786Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC trial

Open access
Versteijne, Eva, van Dam, Jacob L., Suker, Mustafa, Janssen, Quisette P., Groothuis, Karin, Akkermans-Vogelaar, Janine M., Besselink, Marc G., Bonsing, Bert A. +25 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Initial results of the PREOPANC trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. The long-term results are reported. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or upfront surgery in 16 Dutch centers. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine combined with 36 Gy radiotherapy in 15 fractions during the second cycle. After restaging, patients underwent surgery followed by four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery followed by six cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary outcome was OS by intention-to-treat. No safety data were collected beyond the initial report of the trial. RESULTS: Between April 24, 2013, and July 25, 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 119) and upfront surgery (n = 127). At a median follow-up of 59 months, the OS was better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group than in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96; P = .025). Although the difference in median survival was only 1.4 months (15.7 months v 14.3 months), the 5-year OS rate was 20.5% (95% CI, 14.2 to 29.8) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 6.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.7) with upfront surgery. The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was consistent across the prespecified subgroups, including resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine improves OS compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.21.02233

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Versteijne, E., van Dam, J. L., Suker, M., Janssen, Q. P., Groothuis, K., Akkermans-Vogelaar, J. M., Besselink, M. G., Bonsing, B. A., Buijsen, J., Busch, O. R., Creemers, G.-J. M., van Dam, R. M., Eskens, F. A. L. M., Festen, S., de Groot, J. W. B., Groot Koerkamp, B., de Hingh, I. H., Homs, M. Y. V., van Hooft, J. E., Kerver, E. D., Luelmo, S. A. C., Neelis, K. J., Nuyttens, J., Paardekooper, G. M. R. M., Patijn, G. A., van der Sangen, M. J. C., de Vos-Geelen, J., Wilmink, J. W., Zwinderman, A. H., Punt, C. J., van Tienhoven, G., van Eijck, C. H. J., & for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • OLVG (NL)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands
  • Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Isala (NL)
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-04-10
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1220-1230
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4210426142
Cited by
786
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 147 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 184 · 2023: 184 · 2022: 95
FWCI
67.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Amgen
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
  • Eisai
  • Servier
  • Ipsen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, upfront surgery, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, resectable pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine, radiotherapy, adjuvant gemcitabine, overall survival, long-term outcomes, subgroup analysis, prognostic factors, treatment toxicity, quality of life
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review