Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multimodal Interfaces

Oviatt, Sharon·2007·Human Factors and Ergonomics

Abstract

This chapter reviews the main types of multimodal interfaces, their advantages and cognitive science underpinnings, primary features and architectural characteristics, and general research in the field of multimodal interaction and interface design. Multimodal systems have developed rapidly during the past decade, with steady progress toward building more general and robust systems, as well as more transparent human interfaces than ever before. Major developments have occurred in the hardware and software needed to support key component technologies incorporated within multimodal systems, as well as in techniques for integrating parallel input streams. Current natural language-processing algorithms typically rely heavily on the specification of determiners in definite and indefinite references in order to represent and resolve noun phrase reference. Over the past decade, numerous advantages of multimodal interface design have been documented. Unlike a traditional keyboard-and-mouse interface or a unimodal recognition-based interface, multimodal interfaces permit flexible use of input modes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781410615862.ch21

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Oviatt, S.
Venue
Human Factors and Ergonomics
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2007-09-19
Pages
413-432
ISSN
2154-6096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911240772
Cited by
485
References
91
FWCI
69.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multimodal Interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1201/9781410615862.ch21
The paper
Oviatt, S. (2007). Multimodal Interfaces. Human Factors and Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410615862.ch21

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.