Cited by 396Technology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface DesignAging and Gerontology Research

Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition

Fisk, Arthur D., Czaja, Sara J., Rogers, Wendy A., Charness, Neil, Czaja, Sara J., Sharit, Joseph·2018·CRC Press eBooks

Abstract

The first edition of Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches broke ground as an easily accessible source of information, a primer on designing for older adults. In this second edition, the authors, as any good human factors practitioner would, have considered comments from readers. They have revised and updated each of the original chapters, rearranged some of them for a more natural flow, added a new section of tutorials, and provided updated recommended readings. New in the Second Edition: Two new applications chapters: Transportation and Aging-in-Place New Tutorials section provides hands-on guidance for critical issues Re-organization of Design Guidelines section allows for better flow of topics The new Tutorials section begins by focusing on general issues that need to be considered when involving older adults generally in research and usability studies and more specifically in focus group studies. It elucidates statistical considerations relevant to user testing with older adults and modeling approaches such as task analysis, error prediction, and GOMS analysis. Given the prevalence of multimedia in today’s world, the authors include a tutorial on design considerations for multimedia products in general but especially for older adults. Meet the Needs of Older Adults through Proper Design Reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of the field, this multidisciplinary author team translates a vast array of academic literature into guidelines without losing its strong grounding in science. They discuss the role the field of human factors plays in creating technology that is effective and safe to use. This book provides information specific enough to be immediately applicable yet general enough to be relevant to technologies of the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781420080681

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisk, A. D., Czaja, S. J., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
CRC Press eBooks
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2018-11-14
OpenAlex
W2480448245
Cited by
396
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 39
FWCI
58.52
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older adults, human factors, usability, age-friendly design, aging in place, elderly transportation, focus groups, task analysis, error prediction, multimedia design, design guidelines, technology for older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review