Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: When we think of technology-savvy consumers, older adults are typically not the first persons that come to mind. The common misconception is that older adults do not want to use or cannot use technology. But for an increasing number of older adults, this is not true (Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2003). Older adults do use technologies similar to their younger counterparts, but perhaps at different usage rates. Previous research has identified that there may be subgroups of older adults, "Silver Surfers", whose adoption patterns mimic younger adults (Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2003). Much of the previous research on age-related differences in technology usage has only investigated usage broadly -- from a "used" or "not used" standpoint. The present study investigated age-related differences in overall usage of technologies, as well as frequency of technology usage (i.e., never, occasional, or frequent). METHODS: The data were gathered through a questionnaire from younger adults (N=430) and older adults (N=251) in three geographically separate and ethnically diverse areas of the United States. RESULTS: We found that younger adults use a greater breadth of technologies than older adults. However, age-related differences in usage and the frequency of use depend on the technology domain. CONCLUSION: This paper presents technology usage and frequency data to highlight age-related differences and similarities. The results provide insights into older and younger adults' technology-use patterns, which in turn provide a basis for expectations about knowledge differences. Designers and trainers can benefit from understanding experience and knowledge differences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although the range and frequency of technology use among older adults may be less than that of younger adults, the capability still exists for certain types of technologies.
“as Olsen et al [6] described, although the range and frequency of technology use among older adults may be less than that of younger adults, the capability still exists for certain types of technologies”
The survey used in this study was modified from the Mobile Health and Cell Phone Activities surveys by the Pew Research Center.
“This survey was modified from the Mobile Health and Cell Phone Activities surveys by the Pew Research Center.19,20”
From Willingness of women with pelvic floor disorders to use mobile technology to communicate with their health care providers (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,557 · see citing works
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,555 · see citing works
Pfeiffer, E. A. (1975) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x · Cited by 5,320 · see citing works
Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
Self-citationFisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2004) · doi:10.1201/9781420023862 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Self-citationOlder adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life
SELWYN, N., GORARD, S., FURLONG, J., & MADDEN, L. (2003) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x03001302 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1935-1971
Cummings, M. C., & Gallup, G. H. (1973) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1858504 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
The Gallup Poll: public opinion, 2006
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2971 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Horton, A., & Larrabee, G. J. (1999) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/14.5.473 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, Second Edition
Fisk, A. D., Czaja, S. J., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781420080681 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, S., & Fox, S. (2009) · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Health Characteristics of Adults Aged 55 Years and Over: United States, 2004-2007
Schoenborn, C. A., & Heyman, K. M. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e623972009-001 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Use of and Satisfaction With Sources of Health Information Among Older Internet Users and Nonusers
Taha, J., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2009) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnp058 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2001) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2001.01.01.005.00 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationO'hanlon, A., Bond, R., Knapp, B., et al. (2010) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2010.09.02.271.00 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kawamoto, K. (2003) · CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Charness N Fox M Mitchum A Fingerman K Berg C Antonnuci T Smith J in press Lifespan cognition and information technology Handbook of lifespan psychology New York Springer
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM)
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness
Chopik, W. J. (2016) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0151 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Internet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on SHARE data
König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Old Dogs, New Clicks: Digital Inequality in Skills and Uses among Older Adults
Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Information and Communication Technology Use Is Related to Higher Well-Being Among the Oldest-Old
Sims, T., Reed, A. E., & Carr, D. C. (2016) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw130 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Alotaibi, M., Fox, M., Coman, R., Ratan, Z., & Hosseinzadeh, H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19063710 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Gudala, M., Ross, M. E. T., Mogalla, S., Lyons, M., Ramaswamy, P., & Roberts, K. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/32169 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
O'brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/2141943.2141947 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationZimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hawes, T., & Pariz, J. (2021) · Psychology of Popular Media · doi:10.1037/ppm0000277 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
the CLIP Working Group, Nathan, H. L., Boene, H., Munguambe, K., Sevene, E., Akeju, D., Adetoro, O. O., Charanthimath, U., Bellad, M. B., de Greeff, A., et al. (2018) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-017-0450-y · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Li, S.-C. S., & Huang, W.-C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.009 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Saberi, P., McCuistian, C., Agnew, E., Wootton, A. R., Legnitto Packard, D. A., Dawson-Rose, C., Johnson, M. O., Gruber, V. A., & Neilands, T. B. (2021) · Telemedicine Reports · doi:10.1089/tmr.2020.0014 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Lee, D. D., Arya, L. A., Andy, U. U., Sammel, M. D., & Harvie, H. S. (2019) · Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000668 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Distance from home to clinic, median (range) 11 (1–108) ≤3 miles 45 (23) >3 and ≤10 miles 50 (25) >10 and ≤30 miles 84 (42) >30 miles 21 (10) Primary reason for visit”
Why do cognitive prompts hurt learning in older adults?
Kraiger, K., Cavanagh, T. M., & Willis, C. M. G. (2020) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12169 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Olson, K. E., O’Brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Charness, N.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olson, Katherine E.
- Rogers, Wendy A.
- Venue
- Ageing International
- Published
- 2010-09-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-145
- ISSN
- 0163-5158 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-606X
- PMC
- PMC3370300
- OpenAlex
- W2020271227
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 18.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Ageing International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
- Keywords
- technology adoption, older adults, young adults, age differences, Silver Surfer, technology use patterns, technological knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
