Admixture in North America
Abstract
T he history of North America has been marked by the encounter of populations from different continents. The discovery of the New World began a period defined by human migrations at a much larger scale than in previous history. This movement of people, voluntary or forced, changed profoundly the human landscape. As populations came into contact, admixture followed in varying degrees depending on the circumstances. Today, many people living in the US, Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean can trace their ancestry to more than one continent. The most important genetic contributions came from the indigenous Native American groups, Western Europeans and West Africans, although there have also been influences from other regions, such as East Asia and South Asia. We can reconstruct and inter pret this history of migration and admixture using genetic markers. A very complete perspective can be obtained when analyzing autosomal markers (located on any of the chromosomes other than the sex-determining chromosomes, which are inherited from both parents), maternally transmitted mtDNA markers and Y-chromosome markers, which are transmitted from fathers to sons. In many cases, the maternal and paternal admixture histories are remarkably different, so including mtDNA and Y-chromosome markers can provide a much better picture than that offered by the autosomal markers. Thus, using genetic markers we can reconstruct history at the individual and population level, even in the absence of a histori…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
African Americans in the US typically carry segments of DNA shaped by contributions from peoples of Europe, Africa, and the Americas, with variation in African and European admixture proportions across individuals and differences in groups across parts of the country.
“Previous studies have shown that African Americans in the US typically carry segments of DNA shaped by contributions from peoples of Europe, Africa, and the Americas, with variation in African and European admixture proportions across individuals and differences in groups across parts of the country.2–4”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
The paper's estimates of mean African ancestry in 23andMe African Americans are 73% or 75%, unlike previous estimates that typically ranged from 77% to 93%.
“Unlike previous estimates of the mean proportion of African ancestry, which typically have ranged from 77% to 93% African ancestry,2–4,48–62 our estimates, depending on exclusions, are 73% or 75%.”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Consistent with previous studies, the diversity of ancestry profiles of 23andMe African Americans reveal that individuals comprise the full range from 0% to 100% African ancestry, but, further, that there are differences in estimates of ancestry proportions among regions.
“Consistent with previous studies,2,70 the diversity of ancestry profiles of 23andMe African Americans reveal that individuals comprise the full range from 0% to 100% African ancestry, but, further, that there are differences in estimates of ancestry proportions among regions.”
From The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Use of Unlinked Genetic Markers to Detect Population Stratification in Association Studies
Pritchard, J. K., & Rosenberg, N. A. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302449 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Estimating African American Admixture Proportions by Use of Population-Specific Alleles
Parra, E. J., Marcini, A., Akey, J., Martinson, J., Batzer, M. A., Cooper, R., Forrester, T., Allison, D. B., Deka, R., Ferrell, R. E., et al. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302148 · Cited by 771 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We tested 10 African-American samples and a sample from Jamaica for the presence of the common Amerindian-specific mtDNA haplogroups (A, B, C and D) and detected just four individuals with an Amerindian haplogroup among more than 1,000 individuals.(11) Therefore, the available data seem to indicate that the Native Ame…”
Self-citationReed, T. E. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.762 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Implications of correlations between skin color and genetic ancestry for biomedical research
Parra, E. J., Kittles, R. A., & Shriver, M. D. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1440 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Shipwrecks and founder effects: Divergent demographic histories reflected in Caribbean mtDNA
Salas, A., Richards, M., Lareu, M., Sobrino, B., Silva, S., Matamoros, M., Macaulay, V., & Carracedo, Á. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20117 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States
Bryc, K., Durand, E. Y., Macpherson, J. M., Reich, D., & Mountain, J. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.010 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Mersha, T. B., & Abebe, T. (2015) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-014-0023-x · Cited by 450 · see citing works
- Venue
- Pharmacogenomics in Admixed Populations
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2007-08-03
- Pages
- 42-60
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review