Cited by 53Polyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsBirth, Development, and HealthNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biochemical Determinants of Growth Sparing during Neonatal Nutritional Deprivation or Enhancement: Ornithine Decarboxylase, Polyamines, and Macromolecules in Brain Regions and Heart

Bell, J M, Whitmore, W L, Queen, K L, Orband-Miller, L, Slotkin, T A·1987·Pediatric Research

Abstract

In order to elucidate the biochemical mechanisms operating to protect the brain from growth retardation in response to nutritional deprivation, comparisons were made of markers of cellular development in brain regions (cerebellum, cerebral cortex, midbrain + brainstem) and in a tissue which is not spared (heart). Nutritional status of neonatal rats was manipulated by increasing or decreasing the litter size beginning at birth, and development of DNA, RNA, and proteins followed throughout the neonatal period. In addition, we assessed the activity and levels of ornithine decarboxylase and its metabolic products, the polyamines, which are known to coordinate macromolecule synthesis in immature tissue and to provide an early index of perturbed development. Cardiac ornithine decarboxylase and polyamines were altered within 48 h of initiating the changes in litter size, and the direction and magnitude of these biochemical effects were predictive of subsequent impairment or enhancement of organ growth and of cellular development. All three brain regions were buffered from growth alterations relative to the heart, but the cerebellum, which undergoes major phases of cell replication later than the other two regions, was somewhat less protected. The spared brain regions also showed evidence of compensatory hypertrophy in nutritional deprivation (increased protein/DNA ratio) which accounts for maintenance of growth in the presence of reduced cell numbers. Thus, brain growth sparing involves specific cellular responses which are dependent on the maturational profile of each brain region.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1203/00006450-198711000-00024

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Bell, J. M., Whitmore, W. L., Queen, K. L., Orband-Miller, L., & Slotkin, T. A.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
1987-11
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
599-604
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W1973996042
Cited by
53
References
15
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 09713)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
litter size, ornithine decarboxylase, polyamines, brain development, heart development, cerebellum, cerebral cortex, compensatory hypertrophy, protein/DNA ratio, macromolecular synthesis, cell replication, organ growth
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, DNA, Litter Size, Myocardium, Ornithine Decarboxylase, Polyamines, Protein-Energy Malnutrition, Proteins, Rats, Inbred Strains, RNA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review