Cited by 72Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and Cessation

Impact of fetal nicotine exposure on development of rat brain regions: critical sensitive periods or effects of withdrawal?

Slotkin, T.A., Lappi, S.E., Seidler, F.J.·1993·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

Fetal nicotine exposure evokes alterations in central nervous system structural, neurochemical, and behavioral development. In the current study, the relative importance of critical developmental exposure periods and withdrawal were examined by infusing nicotine to pregnant rats using osmotic minipumps beginning on the fourth day of gestation. Infusions were confined to either the first 8 days (withdrawal on gestational day 13), to nearly all of gestation (withdrawal on gestational day 21), or throughout gestation and continued into the first 2 postnatal weeks. Maternal weight gain was retarded by nicotine, with a hierarchy corresponding to the duration of nicotine exposure. Similarly, fetal and neonatal body weights were unaffected in the group receiving the shortest duration of nicotine exposure, and were less affected by the intermediate infusion regimen than by the longest regimen; brain region weights were reduced significantly only with the longest regimen. Using ODC activity, a sensitive marker for altered brain cell development, we found little change in animals exposed to nicotine in early gestation and undergoing withdrawal on day 13. However, in the groups receiving nicotine through the end of gestation or through gestation and into the postnatal period, ODC activity was significantly elevated. These results indicate that withdrawal from nicotine contributes little, if any, effect either to the growth deficits or to abnormalities of brain cell development. Instead, the most important factor appears to be exposure within the developmental period corresponding to the proliferation of nicotinic receptors and the timing of receptor control of cell replication and differentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0361-9230(93)90224-y

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slotkin, T. A., Lappi, S. E., & Seidler, F. J.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Slotkin, T.A.
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993
Volume
31
Issue
3-4
Pages
319-328
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969965832
Cited by
72
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, nicotine withdrawal, critical developmental periods, brain development, brain cell proliferation, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, gestational weight gain, fetal growth, rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Birth Weight, Body Weight, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Dendrites, Female, Membranes, Nicotine, Organ Size, Ornithine Decarboxylase, Pregnancy, Receptors, Nicotinic, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review