Cited by 570Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors

Open access
Kroeze, Willemieke, Werkman, Andrea, Brug, Johannes·2006·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although computer-tailored promotion of dietary change and physical activity has been identified as a promising intervention strategy, there is a need for a more systematic evaluation of the evidence. PURPOSE: This study systematically reviews the scientific literature on computer-tailored physical activity and nutrition education. METHODS: Intervention studies published from 1965 up to September 2004 were identified through a structured search in PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science and an examination of reference lists of relevant publications. Studies were included that applied a pretest-posttest randomized-controlled trial design, were aimed at primary prevention among adults, used computer-tailored interventions to change physical activity and dietary behaviors, and were published in English. The search resulted in 30 publications-11 on physical activity behaviors and 26 on nutrition behaviors, some studies investigated multiple behaviors. RESULTS: Three of 11 of the physical activity studies and 20 of 26 of the nutrition studies found significant effects of the tailored interventions. The evidence was most consistent for tailored interventions on fat reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there seems to be potential for the application of computer tailoring for promoting healthy diets, but more research is needed to test computer-tailored interventions against other state-of-the-art intervention techniques and to identify the mechanisms underlying successful computer tailoring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_2

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ooijendijk WTM, Hildebrandt VH, Stiggelbout M:Trendrapport Bewegen En Gezondheid 2000/2001[Report on Trends in Physical Activity and Health)]. Hoofddorp, The Netherlands: TNO Arbeid, 2002.
  2. Clarke M, Oxman AD (eds):Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.1.5. [Updated April 2002]. InThe Cochrane Library, issue 2. Oxford, UK: Update Software. 2002.
  3. Cohen J:Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic, 1977.
  4. Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986. 213
  5. Systems BDD:Block 95 Food Frequency Questionnaire. Berkley, CA: Block Dietary Data Systems, 1995.
  6. Guthrie JF: Psychosocial determinants of consumption of fiber-rich foods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland-College Park: 1988.
  7. McGuire WJ (ed):Theoretical Foundations of Campaigns. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 570

Metadata

Authors
Kroeze, W., Werkman, A., & Brug, J.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Kroeze, Willemieke
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2006-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
205-223
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1991132102
Cited by
570
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 55
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
computer-tailored intervention, physical activity behavior, dietary behavior, nutrition education, fat loss, primary prevention, adults, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Feeding Behavior, Health Education, Humans, Motor Activity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review