Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examination of "Postconcussion-Like" Symptoms in a Healthy Sample

Iverson, Grant L., Lange, Rael T.·2003·Applied Neuropsychology
DOI 10.1207/s15324826an1003_02
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The post-concussion syndrome (PCS) is relatively common following mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). However, the factors that cause and maintain this syndrome continue to be debated. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the prevalence of postconcussion-like symptoms in a sample of healthy individuals. Participants (N = 104) completed the British Columbia Postconcussion Symptom Inventory-Short Form (BC-PSI-Sf), a test designed to measure both the frequency and intensity of ICD-10 criteria for PCS, and the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed.). Specific endorsement rates of postconcussion-like symptoms ranged from 35.9% to 75.7% for any experience of the symptoms in the past 2 weeks, and from 2.9% to 15.5% for the experience of more severe symptoms. Symptoms reported on the BC-PSI-Sf also showed a moderately high correlation with self-reported depressive symptoms [r (102) =.76, p <.01]. This study illustrates that the presence of postconcussion-like symptoms: (a). are not unique to mild head injury and are commonly found in healthy individuals, and (b). are highly correlated with depressive symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324826an1003_02

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Iverson, G. L., & Lange, R. T.
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4826
DOI
10.1207/s15324826an1003_02
OpenAlex
W2085611538
Cited by
431
References
1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.