The development of an operant conditioning training program for New World Primates at the Bronx Zoo
Abstract
This article describes the development of an operant conditioning training program for 17 species of New World primates at the Bronx Zoo. To apply less invasive techniques to husbandry protocols, the study introduced behaviors-hand feeding, syringe feeding, targeting, scale and crate training, and transponder reading-for formal training to 86 callitrichids and small-bodied cebids housed in 26 social groups. Individual responses to training varied greatly, but general patterns were noted among species. With the exception of lion tamarins, tamarins responded more rapidly than marmosets, Bolivian gray titi monkeys, and pale-headed saki monkeys in approaching trainers and learning behaviors. Marmosets, in comparison to most tamarins, had longer attention spans. This meant that fewer, lengthier sessions were productive whereas shorter, more frequent sessions were most successful for tamarins. Among the cebids, pale-headed saki monkeys needed relatively few sessions to perform basic and advanced behaviors whereas Bolivian gray titi monkeys were less responsive and progressed at a deliberate pace. Marked changes in the animals' behavior during daily husbandry procedures, their voluntary participation in training activities, and the disappearance of aggressive threats toward care staff indicated that training reduced stress and improved the welfare of the animals. During daily training displays, zoo visitors experienced interactive animals while learning the importance of low-stress…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive reinforcement training has been used successfully to train zoo animals to participate in their care for many procedures, including crate training, blood draws, X-rays, dental care, and weighing.
“Positive reinforcement training (PRT) has been used successfully to train animals in zoos to participate in their care for a variety of procedures for many years, including crate training [57,58], blood draws [59,60], X-rays, dental care, weighing, and other procedures [61].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
Working with rather than against macaques during blood collection
Reinhardt, V. (2003) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0603_04 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Hosey, G., & Melfi, V. (2015) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21182 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Positive reinforcement training (PRT) has been used successfully to train animals in zoos to participate in their care for a variety of procedures for many years, including crate training [57,58], blood draws [59,60], X-rays, dental care, weighing, and other procedures [61].”
- Authors
- Savastano, G., Hanson, A., & McCann, C.
- Affiliations
- Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
- ORCID
- McCann, Colleen
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-261
- ISSN
- 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7604
- OpenAlex
- W2113065646
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- operant conditioning, New World primates, callitrichids, hand feeding, targeting, marmoset, animal welfare, animal-assisted education, Bronx Zoo
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Cebidae, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Male, New York, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review