Cited by 91Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

The development of an operant conditioning training program for New World Primates at the Bronx Zoo

Savastano, Gina, Hanson, Amy, McCann, Colleen·2003·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

This article describes the development of an operant conditioning training program for 17 species of New World primates at the Bronx Zoo. To apply less invasive techniques to husbandry protocols, the study introduced behaviors-hand feeding, syringe feeding, targeting, scale and crate training, and transponder reading-for formal training to 86 callitrichids and small-bodied cebids housed in 26 social groups. Individual responses to training varied greatly, but general patterns were noted among species. With the exception of lion tamarins, tamarins responded more rapidly than marmosets, Bolivian gray titi monkeys, and pale-headed saki monkeys in approaching trainers and learning behaviors. Marmosets, in comparison to most tamarins, had longer attention spans. This meant that fewer, lengthier sessions were productive whereas shorter, more frequent sessions were most successful for tamarins. Among the cebids, pale-headed saki monkeys needed relatively few sessions to perform basic and advanced behaviors whereas Bolivian gray titi monkeys were less responsive and progressed at a deliberate pace. Marked changes in the animals' behavior during daily husbandry procedures, their voluntary participation in training activities, and the disappearance of aggressive threats toward care staff indicated that training reduced stress and improved the welfare of the animals. During daily training displays, zoo visitors experienced interactive animals while learning the importance of low-stress…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327604jaws0603_09

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive reinforcement training has been used successfully to train zoo animals to participate in their care for many procedures, including crate training, blood draws, X-rays, dental care, and weighing.

    “Positive reinforcement training (PRT) has been used successfully to train animals in zoos to participate in their care for a variety of procedures for many years, including crate training [57,58], blood draws [59,60], X-rays, dental care, weighing, and other procedures [61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savastano, G., Hanson, A., & McCann, C.
Affiliations
Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2003-07
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
247-261
ISSN
  • 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7604
OpenAlex
W2113065646
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
operant conditioning, New World primates, callitrichids, hand feeding, targeting, marmoset, animal welfare, animal-assisted education, Bronx Zoo
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Cebidae, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Male, New York, Reinforcement, Psychology, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review