Cited by 312Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Structural Equation Modeling: Basic Concepts and Applications in Personality Assessment Research

Crowley, Susan L., Fan, Xitao·1997·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

Structural equation modeling (SEM) has become an increasingly used methodological strategy in psychology. Nevertheless, many psychologists continue to be unclear about how to apply this analytic tool in their research. This article reviews SEM from a conceptual perspective, particularly focusing on confirmatory factor analysis. Additionally, the relation between SEM and other analytic techniques (e.g., exploratory factor analysis) are addressed. A confirmatory factor analytic example is presented and reviewed in detail. Finally, limitations of SEM and other considerations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_4

Cites

0 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 4 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When reporting assessment of model fit in SEM, it is important to use several different indices, as there are no consensus rules within the literature.

    “When reporting the assessment of model fit in SEM, it is important to use several different indices, as there are no consensus rules within the literature that researchers can follow (Crowley & Fan, 1997; Hooper et al., 2008).”

Cites

  • Sagonzi. R P. Fometl. C. cY: Larcker, D F. I1981). Canonicd cnrreia:ior. mdysis ?A a special case clf swucrurd relations mode!. Muiriwn;tu B~luzi-iord Resenrch. i6. 4 3 4 - 4 9 .

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • i3enller F. hf (1482: Confirmatory factor analysis vlii nonitera:i~r es:Ima!lnn. A k . t . inesprnsi\c rnet'hod. Zoitn~ai qf ii.f~;r!ierir:g Reseocch, i9, 4 1742.4.

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Benrier. P. 51. 1 1985) TIieo? arid irnpknte~ifcliiori q!" EQS .4 s:rucnci.ca; equcariom . p r o p m . h i .4ngrlt.s Bh 4DP Statrstlcal Sokware

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved
  • Sentier. P M (,1991). EQS. Ssuc:uraI. rqua:ions program nanuai Los Angeles- BMDP Stadi!~sai

    (n.d.)

    Unresolved

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crowley, S. L., & Fan, X.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
1997-06
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
508-531
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W1971726054
Cited by
311
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
structural equation modeling, confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, personality assessment
MeSH terms
Humans, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Research, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review