The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom
Abstract
Publications from newspapers to research journals are filled with claims about the Internet and its value for education, yet research is just beginning to evaluate uses of these new information resources in the classroom. As part of the University of Michigan Digital Library Project, this research was undertaken as a first step in designing tools for secondary students to access a digital library. The Web offered an initial site for learning how students interact with digital resources and use standard tools. The Web can be seen as a site for student inquiry in science, using it as an information resource that opens the boundaries of the classroom and creates the possibility for students to pursue questions of personal interest. This study looks at students in 6th-grade science classes as they use the Web to carry out an inquiry-based assignment. Their understanding and enactment of their assignment to do research on the Web, their engagement in information seeking, and their use of Web technologies are explored and analyzed. Findings include evidence that students use Web technologies easily but simplistically; that information seeking is a complex and difficult process for these students, who seek to reduce the task to finding an obvious answer or finding a good Web site; and that developing students' understanding of content through use of the Web is a challenge for students and teachers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594 · cited 2×
“Information seeking can be part of an inquiry-based learning environment, which may also include conducting experiments, analyzing data, collaborating with peers and experts, using technology, and producing artifacts (Blumenfeld et al., 1991; National Research Council, 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationInformation Seeking in Electronic Environments
Marchionini, G. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626388 · Cited by 833
Cited by
Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073003277 · Cited by 609
Self-citationSource Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209333183 · Cited by 419
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003285 · Cited by 273
The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum
Leu, D. J., Gregory McVerry, J., Ian O'Byrne, W., Kiili, C., Zawilinski, L., Everett‐Cacopardo, H., Kennedy, C., & Forzani, E. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.55.1.1 · Cited by 176
Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrory Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-104
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2042929030
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.