Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 577

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Designing to Learn About Complex Systems

Hmelo, Cindy E., Holton, Douglas L., Kolodner, Janet L.·2000·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

Complex systems are commonly found in natural and physical science. Understanding such systems is often difficult because they may be viewed from multiple perspectives and their analysis may conflict with or extend beyond the range of everyday experience. There are many complex structural, behavioral, and functional relations to understand as well. Design activities, which allow explorations of how systems work, can be an excellent way to help children acquire a deeper, more systemic understanding of such complex domains. We report on a design experiment in which 6th grade children learned about the human respiratory system by designing artificial lungs and building partial working models. Structure-behavior-function models are used as a framework for the cognitive analysis of the domain. The design activities helped students learn about the respiratory system. The design students indeed learned more than students receiving direct instruction. They learned to view the respiratory system more systemically. As expected, because of the short time they spent on the exercise, they understood more about structure than function and more about the functions of different parts of the respiratory system than its causal behaviors. This early Learning by Design experiment makes several important suggestions about successful learning from design activities: (a) the need to define design challenges functionally; (b) the importance of dynamic feedback; (c) the need for multiple iterations toward a solution; and most important; (d) thinking about design as a system of activities and allocating time so that the full system can be carried out, allowing its full set of affordances to be realized.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls0903_2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3/4, 271-312.
  2. Barrows, H. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
  3. Brown A., 1992, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141, 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chandrasekaran, B. & Josephson, J. (1996, August). Representing function as effect: Assigning functions to objects in context and out. Paper presented at the AAAI-96 Workshop on Modeling and Reasoning About Function, Portland, OR.
  5. 10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chi M., 1981, Cognitive Science, 5, 121, 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chinn C., 1993, Review of Educational Research, 63, 1, 10.3102/00346543063001001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J. & Coulsen, R. L. (1993). Learning, teaching, and testing for complex conceptual understanding. In N. Frederiksen, R. Mislevy, & I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 181-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  9. Ferrari M., 1998, International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231, 10.1080/0950069980201005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gertzman, A. D. & Kolodner, J. L. (1996). A case study of problem-based learning in a middle school science classroom: Lessons learned. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 91-98). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
  11. Goel, A. & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1388-1394 ). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  12. 10.1207/S15328015TLM1004_3 · DOI
  13. Hmelo C. E., 1997, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 401, 10.1177/016235329702000405 · DOI
  14. Hmelo, C. E. & Guzdial, M. (1996). Of black and glass boxes: Scaffolding for learning and doing. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 128-134). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
  15. Hmelo C., 1996, Vivek, 9, 2
  16. Holbrook, J. & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. To appear in Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2000.
  17. Kafai, Y. (1996). Learning design by making games: Children's development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 71-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  18. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037//0003-066X.52.1.57 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J. & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In A. S. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. L. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1998 (pp. 16-22). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing Education.
  21. Kolodner, J. L., Hmelo, C. & Narayanan, H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In D. Edelson & E. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 189-195). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
  22. Koschmann T. D., 1994, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 225
  23. Lehrer, R. (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  24. Linn M. C., 1995, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 103, 10.1007/BF02214052 · DOI
  25. Linn M. C., 1996, Educational Researcher, 25, 18, 10.3102/0013189X025005018 · DOI
  26. Murayama I., 1994, Human Development, 37, 198, 10.1159/000278262 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<125::AID-TEA3>3.3.CO;2-E · DOI
  28. Penner D. E., 1998, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429, 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060 · DOI
  29. Resnick, M. (1996). New paradigms for computing, new paradigms for thinking. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 255-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  30. Roth W.-M., 1995, Science Education, 79, 475, 10.1002/sce.3730790502 · DOI
  31. Roth W.-M., 1996, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129, 10.1207/s15327809jls0502_2 · DOI
  32. Savery J. R., 1995, Educational Technology, 35, 31
  33. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press.
  34. Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Schauble L., 1991, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859, 10.1002/tea.3660280910 · DOI · Paper page
  36. SoftKey Multimedia. (1995). BodyWorks [CD-ROM]. Cambridge, MA: Author.
  37. 10.1023/A:1009421303064 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 577

Metadata

Authors
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
2000-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
247-298
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2025677634
Cited by
577
References
1
FWCI
60.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.